Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone see the latest EXCUSE from Drudge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:32 PM
Original message
Anyone see the latest EXCUSE from Drudge
This fucking guy is unbelievable http://www.drudgereport.com/flashmfa.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah right, Drudge
If there's nothing there then how come he resigned so quick? Repukes don't resign unless they're actually caught moving the dead body, metaphorically (and perhaps literally) speaking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nobody cares
if it's on Drudge, its crap anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even if the guy was of age, that means Foley was doing what they
raked Barney Frank over the coals for doing for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. For those of us who won't give Drudge clicks and profits - please
tell us what he said? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Post it here so Drudge doesn't get clicks and sell more ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. exactly. I dont click on those sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't give a sh*t about the freeper news network. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, it was a GLITCH that IDed the page, AND the page was EIGHTEEN
Yeah-right!!!!!!11

*********QUOTE**********

ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER

FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD

Wed Oct 04 2006 20:32:06 ET

A posting on ABCNEWS.COM of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser.

The website PASSIONATE AMERICA detailed the startling exposure late Wednesday.

ABCNEWS said in a statement: "We go to great lengths to prevent the names of alleged sex crime victims from being revealed. On Friday there was a very brief technical glitch on our site which was overridden immediately. It is possible that during that very brief interval a screen name could have been captured. Reviews of the site since then show no unredacted screen names."

SEX CHAT WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD

On Tuesday ABC news released a high-impact instant message exchange between Foley and, as ABC explained, a young man "under the age of 18."

ABC headlined the story: "New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote"

But upon reviewing the records, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned, the young man was in fact over the age of 18 at the time of the exchange.

A network source explains, messages with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday.

Developing...

********UNQUOTE**********
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think ol' drudge is using that information from wild bill
The information that was pulled within minutes because it was wrong. drudge needs to learn to check his stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bucknaked Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Claiming that the former congrsnl page, became 18 DURING the IMs
Which still means, that this Predator, Foley, went after this person while in the Congressional page program, while this person was under age. And it also does nothing to dispute that he continued to look at the program, for his own pool of underage, boy-toys.

Simply, it's wishfull thinking on the part of the politically damned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Raw Story says different?
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Blogger_outs_boy_in_Foley_scandal_1004.html

Blogger reposts item 'outing' boy in Foley scandal, claimed he's of age

RAW STORY
Published: Wednesday October 4, 2006


The blog Passionate America has revealed the identity and published a photograph of an alleged victim of disgraced Rep. Mark Foley in a post that was pulled and later re-posted with additional information.

RAW STORY can verify that the young man in question is not the Congressional page from the emails that originally surfaced; with that in mind, a direct link to the Passionate America post is not provided here.

RAW STORY has learned that the recipient of the Foley emails is currently 17 (and was 16 at the time of the correspondence).

Passionate America contends that the young man they identified took part in some of the instant message conversations obtained by ABC news. In those messages, the boy explicitly identified himself as being under the age of 18.

If the boy was over the age of 18 at the time of the messages, Foley's communication with him would likely still be considered criminal. Sex predator legislation is generally written bearing in mind that law enforcement sting operations rely on undercover officers pretending to be minors.

However, even if he is now 21, the man identified could still have been as young as 16 at the time of the messages. ABC has stated that they are in possession of chat logs from as much as five years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Its kind of comical to watch them squirm like rats in a trap
The excuses are becoming waaaaay out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I am not going to click on your link and to give Drudge more hits
(and ad revenue) but if this is the same as Al Franken was talking, that Drudge blames the Page - I think that this should pretty much finish him as any credible source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC