xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 10:57 AM
Original message |
Page Tip Line...GOP attempt to elicit claims against Dems. |
originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Well if they do that... |
|
we may decide to alert concerned citizens to the hypocrisy of members in the Republican party.
|
Perky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
If there are democratic perps I want to know about them as well.
If the GOP pulls a stunt like that against an innocent man... There will be hell to pay on election day.
The ethics committee is 3-3 membership.
It would still come back to an issues of cover-up by the GOP of Foley.
The Dems are not covering anything up.
|
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Everything is in place for Rove's dirty tricks. |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Yup. Just as I thought. |
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Let's have all of this out.
A serious on-going discussion of HYPOCRISY will be good for this country.
Maybe the Real People will step forward - finally.
|
JackBeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
You're right. But how is this going to be verifiable before Drudge gets his slimy hands on any Democratic accusation?
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. It won't be. But that will necessitate a serious discussion of PROOF. |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 11:09 AM by patrice
Something Else that we NEED to understand better.
These are learning opportunities. I hope "We" CAN handle them that way. We don't need to be a bunch of robots repeating talking points like some we can think of, but IF we could work harder on framing the semantics with very deliberate "definitions of terms", such as "proof", we could be at least a little more effective.
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. True. Sludge will put out the rumor (tip) and not retract when the facts |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
you are looking awfully pink and grand
and
the asses.....
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |