Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Foley is NOT mired in a sex scandal, he's mired in a sexual predator crime

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:19 AM
Original message
Foley is NOT mired in a sex scandal, he's mired in a sexual predator crime
I really wish the media, GOP, etc. would knock it off. The guy was a sexual predator in a position of power who went after minors. Clinton and Lewinsky were a "sex scandal... the Profuma Affair was a sex scandal. This is a crime against children by a sexual predator. And yes, I believe a sixteen-year-old is legally and emotionally a child.

Sex scandals are between two consenting adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. THANK YOU. What's alarming is that so many republicans don't see the
difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. are you talking about this list of Republicans?
from dkosopedia:

Republican Sex Scandals

http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Republican_Sex_Scandals


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Sure, them. But also their bots in media who talk about "overly friendly"
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 01:33 PM by glitch
and other benign terms for abuse. :puke:

Thanks for posting that list. It should litter the Net like confetti on New Years Day.

edit: and also creepy everyday repukes you happen to run in to who equate THIS with a consensual sex between adults (Clinton-Monica). Again, I :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. "naughty" is another one. Imagine how voters victimized in one way
or another by child exploitation react to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Like a kick in the stomach.
"Have I told you today how much I hate these people?" Mike Malloy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush called the pages "children" yesterday
So that is what everyone else should as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. good call
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's also not a gay sex scandal either
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 12:21 PM by Marnieworld
Genders are irrelevant here. It's all about age and the laws about sexual contact with minors. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly! It's a sexual predator harassing & preying on minors/ employees!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think that got conceded
Whenever people conceded pedophilia as desiring prepubescent boys, we lost the crime aspect of this scandal. Democrats should have started talking about the age of consent in Florida being 18, instead of conceding to the DC age. And shouldn't have shrunk away from the word pedophile. Once the "facts" are agreed to in a conventional wisdom sort of way, it's almost impossible to turn the herd. So once again, we lost this scandal ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. You're exactly right .... but naturally the Democrats .....
..... including many right here on DU, in their zeal for terminological precision, chided and scolded over the use of the word 'pedophilia'.

The REAL fact is, on Main Street, where this MATTERS, there's no fucking difference at all. Let the **other** side look like word parsers. We should be keeping this as SIMPLE as possible. 'Child Molester' is not an invalid term in this matter. Again, it might be impreise, but the message gets UNDERSTOOD - and that's what we're trying to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. As you obviously understand from reading your post
Language and phrasing IS very important. Take the debate away from it and call him a sexual predator. That has the same kind of reaction on "Main Street" as "child molester" thanks to all those Dateline specials. It works, It is shocking. And it keeps the debate to a minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree.
When I think sex scandal, I think about two consenting adults. This was certainly not the case. He's a predator, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. I agree with you.
I've been smacked around a little referring to 16 year old males as boys and children this week, but I'm sticking by my opinion.

The only similarity between Clinton/Lewinsky and Foley/Pages is the boundary violation and power differential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC