JCMach1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:31 AM
Original message |
BBC: Taliban Control 1/2 of Afghanistan |
|
Just gave the information live. Things just keep going to hell there.
|
SledDriver
(699 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I thought things were going "swimmingly"?
|
philb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
i just heard that Sasquatch gave birth to a "live alien"
how cool is that?
|
spinbaby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
3. And NATO is in charge of the other half? |
|
I think that's what they said this morning, but I hadn't had my coffee yet.
|
genie_weenie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Control of countryside terrain is not the issue. US/NATO forces |
|
never really controlled much of Afghanistan, save for Kabul, Kandahar, Mazar-e-Sharif, Herat and some other cities.
The plan as I recall was for a ripple effect with NATO forces controlling major cities and allowing the control of the surrounding countryside to extend out in a fashion similar to throwing pebbles in a body of water. This would be accomplished by having USAID, the UN and other nations rebuild the infrastructure, agriculture, locate/destroy the million+ mines scattered across the poor land and importing money and creation of jobs. Although the only job field which is growing is poppy cultivation.
Whether this will work or not is being decided, now...
|
JCMach1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Now NATO is solely in charge of things... |
|
somoehow, I don't think it will make a difference.
|
philb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
of only one thing and that is asking permission to be nato
|
HughBeaumont
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
7. "Freedumb in Afghanistan, Say Goodbye, Taliban . . " |
|
"BUSH WAS RIGHT!" (neener neener neener) "BUSH WAS RIGHT!" Remember that little ditty from The Right Brothers? Fuggin idiots.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
8. After watching Frontlines "Return of the Taliban" i am not surprised at |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Funny, I seem to remember the same headline from about |
|
1992 or thereabouts.
And that was three years AFTER the invading superpower was gone.
Is it looking like they are coming back, stronger than ever?
|
philb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. i forgot that we invaded afghanistan in 1992 |
|
lemme get on wikki and refresh my memory
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. It took three years after the Soviets pulled out for the Taliban to |
|
establish themselves as much as they apparently have now, and we are still there. In fact, the Taliban never did gain complete control, as evidenced by the existance of the northern alliance as late as 2001. I suspect that this go-round they'll be even stronger.
|
philb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-05-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |