Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The sneaky dinky Freeh trap - way to go, Nancy!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 03:04 PM
Original message
The sneaky dinky Freeh trap - way to go, Nancy!
What the good ole boys club tried to do today was almost an abomination. They wanted the former Feeble Feebie himself to serve the GOP and protect their chances 4 weeks from now.

If Freeh had been appointed, he would have scheduled a 6 week investigation. EVERY SINGLE GOPer in office would have then said,
"Sorry, I can't comment. It is an active investigation, so it would be unfair to comment. Besides, Special Investigator Freeh has instructed us not to comment on any aspect while his investigation is continuing."

But, because Pelosi showed that she has a pair larger than any page, that won't happen. Their attempt at political cover fell flatter than my souffle.

WAY TO GO, NANCY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. She is terrific on this- way to go. I hope to see her on TV soon...
...explaining how choosing Freeh was yet another attempt to cover up in a LOOONG line of cover ups on various issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you translate for us common folk?
What did Pelosi do? And what was the result?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. the "ethics" dudes of the GOP
also known as Groping Old Perverts, made a dog and pony show of how concerned they were. How they wanted to work together to solve the problem. How they thought that only a strong bipartisan approach would safeguard those young 'uns. And therefore, they had selected Luis Freeh as their go-two guy, a two stepping, goose-stepping, anti-Dem guy who still hates Clinton's penis, to (snark, snort, sniff) "INVESTIGATE" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge, "trust us") the whole page situation. Luckily for Mark FoleyGate, Freeh would not have been free to contact Foley himself because he would no longer be a member of congress.

Nancy, bless her balls, said no. It is NOT enough, it is not good enough, and a cover-up is not the answer.

She stopped them dead in their tracks and Freeh will no longer do what he was going to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is very telling...
That Nancy Pelosi was able to accomplish this in this Congress. We all know the lengths and depths the repukes have gone to, in the past, to emasculate and disenfranchise Dems in congress.

This is a lot more indicative of something than some might realize. The repukes may be in complete meltdown.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm impressed with her tenacity
Especially when being booed into silence the other day. She seems to know when to retreat and rest up, waiting for another opportunity to show force again. I hope she keeps it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC