Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ok, so the score thus far (if I am getting it right....)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:13 PM
Original message
Ok, so the score thus far (if I am getting it right....)
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 04:21 PM by pepperbear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes that is the score so far - gerry studds? Missed that story.
This will be billed as a harmless 'frat prank', like waterboarding and the Bill of Rights. Yet, this really does look like the end of the Speaker of the House. Couldn't happen to a better asshole, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. RE: Gerry studds: here's a link to queenfreep basically saying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. from the page scandal back in '83...
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 04:48 PM by progdonkey
Studds was one of two congressmen (the other was a Repub) who was censured by the House for having sex with 17-year-old pages (Studds with another male; Crane with a girl).

The RW talking heads are using Studds as some sort of hypocrisy cudgel to beat Democrats with, except that the vote for censure for both was something like 430-3 (I'm guessing two of the three were Studds and Crane ;-) ).

The two biggest differences, though (disregarding both the whole cover-up issue, and the fact that Studds was censured along with a Republican, where the only difference was it was straight, not gay), are that the 17-year-old in Studds' case supported him in his assertion that it was consensual (they even both took part in a press conference after the censure hearing, basically saying, "What we do is none of anyone's business.") and Studds wasn't a predator like Foley, who seems to have made a pass at every male page he met. (Of course, despite it's being "consensual," it was certainly highly inappropriate, if not illegal--though I think 17 was and is still technically of age in DC; I mention it as a point only to differentiate it from Foley's case, where one of the many teens is on record as describing the advances as "sick" 13 times.)

Edit: I forgott hwo to spel "consensual."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Ah, I've been wondering who they were talking about.
So this is who Hannity keeps talking about. So if the DEMS do it, then the REPS should be able to get away with it too. What schoolyard mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I just remembered something that's extremely important...
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 04:51 PM by progdonkey
The sexual contact in Studds' case was in 1973, (Crane's in 1980) meaning that, when he was in the midst of the whole scandal in '83 and the page was saying it had been consensual, the page was a 27-year-old saying the sex when he was 17 was consensual. How many of the pages Foley's been chatting with will say in ten years, "Oh yeah, I was totally in to it"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. he was molested as an early teen? Is that there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Clintons should be in a category by themselves.
Only because they are usually blamed first.
Kind of surprised that Ahmendimejad has not been blamed as yet. Or Chavez. Coming soon I trust
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Of COURSE it's Clinton's fault
if he hadn't gotten those blow jobs in the Oval Office and RUINED this country Foley would have NEVER thoughtt that he could get away with this...DUH..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton. Gay priests. Evil bloggers. Teen pranksters. Don't forget Poland.
Everybody but the guy who did it and the ones who covered it up for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. two more
Dick Morris!!!!!

George Soros
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. George Soros...Hastert's big LIE. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. yeah, Republican behavior is the Democrats' fault
sheesh

:eyes:

I hope there is a place for them in the hypocrite/hyperbole level of hell, should it exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. No LIBERAL MEDIA yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. blame
Hastert's Hemeroids..!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC