Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:40 PM
Original message |
Help me out here..Page was 18 years old? |
|
This guy keeps claiming that the page Foley IM'd was 18...I thought he was 16?
|
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:42 PM
Original message |
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
18. The tricky bastard changes his age every 12 months! |
|
These kids are doing this just to confuse the poor republic congress critters.
|
democrat in Tallahassee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Which one? There were more than one, right? |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
25. Right, he's a serial predator |
|
This isn't just one incident. The guy has been preying on teen-agers, of varying ages, for years.
|
Jeff In Milwaukee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
In any case, unless it's changed recently, the legal age of consent in Washington, DC is sixteen, so I'm not sure if Foley broke any laws, even if he had contact.
|
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Age of consent question: |
|
I heard Pat Buchanan say that about the age of consent being 16 in the District of Columbia - first time I ever heard that - do we know for a fact that's true? Just wondering...
|
Jeff In Milwaukee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
24. As usual, Pat is blowing smoke... |
|
right out his ass. He said that the age of consent was 16 in Washington D.C. because Congress is "in thrall" to the gay lobby.
Fact is (and I checked this right after Pat's comment) that every southern state except Florida, Virgina, and Texas have the age of constent at sixteen. Is the Mississippi State Legislature "in thrall" to the gay lobby? Doubtful.
Make you wonder how long these guys can go on TV and bullshit before somebody calls them on it.
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. Actually, it depends a lot on where both parties |
|
were when the IMs and email were sent.
In another irony, Foley's own legislation (on internet predation) might be used to convict if there was solicitations to meet up for sexual contact.
|
Justice Is Comin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. Yup each receiver/sender individual state laws apply. |
|
It's mucky. But I'm betting there was enough interstate sex solicitation with the internet laws to put the criminal system in motion.
Let alone the alcohol plying and possible Zorro type visits to the dorm.
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-08-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
:rofl:
that's great! I had a more "rapunzel" type image... you know, "rapunzel, rapunzel, let down your jock straps"
|
notadmblnd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. Why would he limit himself to pages |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-07-06 04:59 PM by notadmblnd
the internet is a great place to expand a pedophiles horizons? What makes anyone think that his internet trysts were limited to congressional pages all above the age of consent. It is after all the victims "Youth" a pedophile is fixated on. Other wise, he'd have relationships with men his own age and there'd be no scandal. I wonder if AOHell has logs of their chatroom texts?
Even if all the boys Foley approched were consenting and gay (I don't think they were all gay) they still have a right to a work place free of hostility, so at the very least Foley is guilty of sexual harassment.
Just my opinion
|
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The one that don't know shit?
The page was 16.
Tell the guy that there is much more to come, stock up on popcorn.
|
nolies32fouettes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There were a few...
I think one was 16, and one was 17.. thats ALl i remember.. I think one is 18 now, another of the earlier pages is 21... dang memory has a leak!
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Pretty soon they will have us believing that he was 22 and wanting |
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. shit, I think I heard that one already..... |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. no hannity is just bringing monica down to 19 |
originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Foley made advances on MANY MANY male pages... |
|
The one that lead to his eventual discovery was 16. However, the one that lead him to resign was almost 18. He wasn't the only page to have a sexually explicit conversation with Foley, just the only person to keep his IMs. He was a Republican, all these pages are Republicans who have been preyed upon.
There are several other who were picked and advanced upon by Foley, and they say he tried to solicit them over the internet for sex, a crime for anyone under 18, even though it may not be illegal for them to have sex. (Ironic isn't it?)
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He was 25. Actually, he was a 25-year-old woman. |
|
And Foley is a Democrat. Yeah, that's the ticket...
|
bronxiteforever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Yeah Foley was dumping the kid for his new wife Morgan Fairchild! |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Just remember that Monica Lewinsky was 22 |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-07-06 04:50 PM by eleny
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |
14. 1 page was 18 at the time. he pretended to be almost 18. other pages |
|
had im's too. the dude with the email was 16. the right is now only tlaking about this one page, implying and trying to get out the story it is the only page and over 18. that is NOT the full story. many (?) pages from 1998? to now have spoken out and htey have stated they were 16 and 17
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
15. "This guy" is playing games. |
|
Ask him why he is defending republic congressmen having sex with teenagers.
|
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
got the usual bill clinton argument.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. Monica was in her 20's, ask him again why he is defending |
|
republics having sex with teenagers.
|
Erika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
21. He was using the pages as a sex farm as one analyst said |
|
Grooming the kids for sex at the age of 18. Kind of like foreplay for two or so years.
|
Little Star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Which Page? Somebody needs to put this stuff in |
|
some kind of chronological order before these perverts slip away.
|
FormerDittoHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-07-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Tell this 'guy' he should start questioning the things he hears on FOX |
|
I turned into a FORMER Rush Limbaugh fan because I found that, in spite of all of bluster of being 'right', they were just a bunch of LIARS. BIG TIME, BALD FACE, TWO FACED, HYPOCRITICAL LIARS.
They TALK about CHARACTER.
They SHOUT for the resignation of Rather, et al when things aren't 100% right. AND THEY ARE.
YET, when their "heros" (Limbaugh, O'Reilly, etc) get caught RED HANDED with FLAMING LIES, they "somehow" find their way PAST it...
It's USELESS to argue FACTS with someone who is willing to just believe FAIRY TALES if they come from someone with a deep, assuring voice...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |