Interesting photo essay on Congressional Pages from Time.com

[Bucky]

It's a cute historical feature on the history of the Congressional page program, but I guess I have to quibble just a little bit with the partisan tone Time seems to take.

[sce56]

1. Humm well all we got now is Foley's Follys

[bleever]

2. Their partisan bias is showing.

"Time" is clearly biased because they left out other important Republican office-holders who didn't prey on the pages.


:rofl:

[Bucky]

3. apologies

for the record, I may have tweaked the text on the pictures just a little bit

[Fridays Child]

10. Bucky!

:spank: :P

[Bucky]

12. Friday!

Thanks for the redass. That smile of contentment on the spanked smily says it all

Ahhh! grrr

[LeftCoast]

4. LOL! K & R!

:kick:

[Bucky]

6. ty, L C

[SaveAmerica]

5. For the love of all that is holy, do not show the Hoops pic to Foley

[Bucky]

8. You comment might be a bit trolly (except for that cute young left goalie)

Your rhyme made me spew out my guacamole!

[qnr]

7. Is that really Time? They misspelled correspondence --- unless they

wanted to imply corrosive :)
Here's a K&R

Edit: ah, I see the slight font difference

[Bucky]

9. Good cetch. I have contocted Time magizine and axed them to fix it.

ya gnitpicker

[qnr]

11. Well, I mostly brought it out because I thought the link to corrosive was

so apropos heheh

[Catherine Vincent]

13. You almost had me!

Nice pictures though.

[MindMatter]

14. Just for the record ...

How can we be so sure those other Republicans DIDN'T have sex with their pages?

[The Count]

15. Reminds me of the actual quote from an article Al Franked read

"If Hastert and Bonher cannot get on the same page, the GOP's troubles will mount"