3.58 tremor detected in N.Korea detected by S. Korea...

[cynatnite]

on MSNBC. Still no confirmation from other agencies.

[DemFromMem]

1. USGS says NADA

Sorry, but I trust the USGS. They're not a partisan bunch and they say there has been no seismic activity on the Korean peninsula. 3.58 seems too significant for them to miss. NK isn't exactly known for being truthful.

[taquinas101]

4. South Korea made the report . . .

not all Koreans are the same. Kind of like all people who speak spanish are not necessarily mexican.

[Ediacara]

18. Still though, the rocks don't lie

And unless their is a concerted effort to shut the USGS up, the data do not support the South Korean claim.

[Taoschick]

2. I heard

The USGS was starting to get readings but nothing confirmed yet.

[taquinas101]

3. BBC Also Says Its Confirmed - Fox Says Unconfirmed

The BBC refers to the evidence from South Korea:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/6032525.stm

"A South Korean official said an explosion had been detected in the north-east of North Korea, measuring 3.5 on the Richter scale."


Oddly, Fox News states, "North Korea Claims Test of Nuclear Weapon; U.S. Officials Can't Confirm," and contains no mention of the South Koreans detecting an explosion.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,218699,00.html

[mn9driver]

5. Even if it failed, they would report it as a success.

The Bush administration has demonstrated that as being a highly successful tactic.

[Ediacara]

6. The USGS has automated pages that show off all seismic activity worldwide

There has been nothing greater than a M_w 2.5 on the Korean Penninsula in over a week. I have no idea why SK geologists are saying this, but the rocks say nothing has happened.



ON EDIT: Now there does appear to be a M_w <4.0 in NE North Korea, three hours after the test supposedly happened... (supposedly 9:36 PM eastern time)

[cynatnite]

7. It doesn't make sense why SK would fake it...

Sure it got our attention for a few minutes, but if they faked it who is going to take them seriously?

[lonestarnot]

9. Money maybe? Commodities, something you can bet on that

if this is a faked up bunch of crap which I think it is.

[Ediacara]

12. I am so confused by this earthquake claim

Why make a fake claim like this if it's utimately so easy to identify as faked?

[lonestarnot]

23. Get Foley off the headlines.

[cynatnite]

13. Sorry...

it just seems to me if it was fake much of the world would find out. Why would they give him anything knowing they faked a test?

I don't think SK faked it.

[lonestarnot]

24. SK stands to benefit from those wanting to protect it.

[Ediacara]

11. I know it doesn't make sense for SK to "fake it"

but unless someone is hacking into the USGS to block this earthquake, the rocks simply cannot lie. And honestly, it would be counterproductive to block out this information as the lack of any detected seismic activity at the world's premier earth sciences agency's website makes the whole thing look like a sham.

[lonestarnot]

10. Thanks Dinoboy!

[IDemo]

17. According to the USGS site, nothing under a 4.0 should appear on your map

"Latest Earthquakes Magnitude 2.5 or Greater in the United States and Adjacent Areas and Magnitude 4.0 or Greater in the Rest of the World - Last 7 days"

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_all.php

[lonestarnot]

19. Well no wonder SK detected a 3.8. LOL

:rofl:

[Ediacara]

21. That's for the global map

The legend for the local maps has symbols down to a M_w 2.5.



Similar zoom in maps for the United States have earthquakes down to a M_w 1.0.

[IDemo]

26. I can see the map legend, but no events under a 4.0 appear

There should be a number of smaller quakes in the more active regions, but none are displayed. Alaska, Washington, and California are fairly well blanketed, but the smallest I can see on a world 'drill-down' map is a 4.3 near Fiji...

[lonestarnot]

8. Yes just bullshit.

[alfredo]

14. Local news said no confirmation and that they may not be

able to detect it.



Bullshit. Not sure if I can tell you why, but trust me, it is bullshit.

I guess their polling told bush that NK exploding a nuke would be bad for the junta.

[htuttle]

15. Gamma Ray emissions would tell us the honest truth

No way you're going to tell me that every appropriate spy satellite hasn't been aimed at North Korea this week. There should be no reason to guess whether they let off a nuke (although with mid-terms coming up, there are many reasons for BushCo to 'insinuate'...).

[lonestarnot]

20. Exactree! This is 2006!

[C_U_L8R]

16. more live seismic charts here

http://aslwww.cr.usgs.gov/Seismic_Data/heli2.shtml

[cynatnite]

22. Australian Prime Minister tells AP seismic activity detected as well...

says MSNBC news.

[lonestarnot]

25. hmmm. will check it out.

Even if there was a test, if it is so dinky that it won't register, it is a fucking failure. Like a popcorn fart in a teakettle.