Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Senate Debate – Alito Nomination – Thread 3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:13 AM
Original message
Official Senate Debate – Alito Nomination – Thread 3
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 11:34 AM by Viva_La_Revolution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R AND THANKS VIVA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Leahy's rockin!
Reminding us that when FDR wanted to stack the courts, Dem congress said no!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. He's going to get a BIG FAT THANK YOU from me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Extended Debate
(( Yesterday, Armando at Kos wrote this about Extended Debate and Byron York:))

Today, Byron York reports that:

Word is that Democrats will stage a talk-a-thon on the Alito nomination when it reaches the Senate floor. The nomination is expected to be approved by the Judiciary Committee this morning, and Majority Leader Bill Frist is expected to move it quickly to the floor. But now it is also expected that Democrats will push for extended debate on the issue, with every Democratic member taking the floor to stretch out debate in what will amount to a non-filibuster filibuster.

This could be encouraging. However, York writes that the Republicans have a counterplan:

But one Republican source says this morning that the GOP plans to "accommodate them without delaying the vote." By that, the source means that Frist will likely keep the Senate open very late to allow Democrats to talk into the night. And then Frist will file for cloture, and unless Democrats choose to filibuster the nomination, which seems highly unlikely, there will be a vote. "Judge Alito will be Justice Alito" before the president's State of the Union address next Tuesday, the source says.

An interesting situation could arise -- the Democrats could take this great opportunity to explain the monumental issues at stake to the American People and the country could have the national discussion that should have commenced in earnest about the extremist Justices that Bush promised to place on the Court. Judges like Scalia, Thomas and Bork. Is that what America deserves and desires? Let's debate it. In the Senate. Exercising its constitutional duty of advice and consent.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/24/162329/893
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Frist already said this morning at opening that this would be
going on late into the night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. If the dems truly believe what they say, they will filibuster

They KNOW that Alito is a disaster. If they truly believe what they say - they will FILIBUSTER.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
70. Unfortunately, C-Span is the only one running this. If Faux news and the
rest of our "media" would get on the ball and expose the sheeple it might be a meaningful debate but I predict they will run 30 second sound bites of Dem's carefully chosen to make them look like whiners and loads of Republicans calling them whiners. That's the way this stuff usually plays out. So, once again, the sheeple can rest secure in the knowledge that their "moral majority" party is still watching their backs.

A filibuster isn't really going to accomplish much but I'd at least like to see them do it so that Alito can't be confirmed before the SOTU address!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. "this is the man whose going to be a check and balance on our rights?"
Woot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Damn he is making me SO proud to be a Dem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. WOOHOO! Kennedy!
Give 'em hell, Ted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. "would be a shameful abrogation of our responsibilities"
go Ted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. I am SO looking forward to what Senator Byrd has to say about ScAlito.
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 11:23 AM by in_cog_ni_to
I haven't heard him say anything about him. The last I saw Byrd address the ScAlito issue was when he read Frist the riot act on the floor one day when Frist, AGAIN, threatened the use of the "nuclear option." THAT pissed Byrd off because no one had stated the Dems were going to filibuster. Byrd set him straight!:hug: I can't WAIT to hear him today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Me too - any idea when that might be?
I would chew off my own foot to make sure I can't leave for work and miss that! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. I love you Ted Kennedy
With all my heart. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. Just to let everyone know...these threads are now on the DU Home Page!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Well, shut my mouth, aren't we special.
Kennedy is my favorite liberal - and I love how the neocons eyes roll back in their heads, and the veins stand out in their necks whenever his name is mentioned.

Ahhh... the little things that make life worth living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. I Will Donate $10 to Every Senator Who Supports A Fillibuster? Who's With
me? Yes, I know that's $1,000 (in a perfect world), but that's tough $hit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. I could match you dime for dollar
and right now, that is a fortune for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. I want the names of the Senators on the R side of the aisle
wh foudn Alito's answers wanting. Kennedy distinctly said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. What was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. Kennedy said something about the fact that Senators
on both sides of the aisle were not happy about Alito's unresponsiveness to questions during the hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. What is that vote tally for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Senators who have already announced their vote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Remember - They *can* change their votes up until last minute! (nt)
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. good reminder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. Ah, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. Kennedy is rockin' the Boxer-esque signage!
Go, baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Eloquent and powerful...go Kennedy! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Dupe
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 11:32 AM by Wordie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Computer probs this AM. Dupe...sorry.
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 11:33 AM by Wordie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Awww... I was flattered you felt so strongly about my post!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Well, there was that too. A little over-excited here, I think. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
27. ripping on the signing statement,
he called it a "bizarre" view. Hee hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
31. "Complete reversal" for all the agreements made about the
torturing and other laws. We need a completel reversal of the last 5 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
36. "the government insisted on an all-white jury, and he found
no problem with that.. eventually that case was overturned, as it should have been."

Alito made some scary-ass decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. LOL, now there's a way to sell "No to Alito!" to Joe America
"We don't want Alito because he's made some scary-ass decisions".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Its something we can all understand.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
37. Kennedy: Alito was lone dissenter in important discrimination case...
Making case that Alito doesn't care about the little guy very well. Citing case after case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
39. You know what pisses me off? The Republicans, so far, have a party line
vote - why are there no attacks on them for that?

What's up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
41. preliminary vote totals are now
35 Yea
18 No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #41
56. is everybody sure these are only "preliminary" vote totals?
if a filibuster is going to happen--when does that start? apparently they can change their "no" vote to filibuster??

how is this going to work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #56
97. they have to move for cloture before a filibuster can happen
right now, they are in scheduled debate. No cloture has been called for yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
42. Durbin up now.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
43. Durbin up now...he's a great speaker, too. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. I am really developing a deep love of this mild mannered man n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. He's pointing out in how many SC cases O'Connor was the deciding
vote. So many important national issues. Describing the changes in her postition over the years. Crucial 5th vote on human rights, civil rights, minority rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. I'm so sad listening to Durbin...
talk about all those 5-4 votes that protected and expanded our civil rights...all the while knowing that the rethugs want to change the court for the express purpose of rolling back all that progress. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. As he rattles off the list
The Theocons are rubbing their hands in glee over all the 5-4 votes that will now go the other way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. Durbin pointed out that the extreme RW forced the withdrawal of
Meirs, because they didn't trust that she would vote the way they wanted on abortion. But when Alito was nominated, they didn't say anything critical, but supported him.

That ought to tell us something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. now going over his 1985 job application
:scared:

This guy has some f'ed up positions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
50. Finally, a rebuttal to the Bar Association argument
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 11:56 AM by Wordie
The Bar Assoc. only looks at 3 things: technical ability, honesty, judicial temperament.

They don't look to values, philosophy, or how he will rule for the American people.

I'm so glad someone finally addressed this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. I find the ABA determination on his honesty as a person...
somewhat dubious. If he was fundamentally honest he wouldn't have spent so much of his hearings dodging questions and not giving real answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
51. Again I ask, how did the ABA rate Meirs - wasn't it the highest too?
So, how is that a criteria for Alito if it wasn't for Meirs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #51
80. Miers withdrew her nomination before her rating was completed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogmi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
53. Damn Nelson!
I think we should flood his email with reproach. Any bets on who else will defect? I'd be willing to put out Landrieau at 2 to 1. Any takers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. Nope I agree Landrieu might very well vote for
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 12:05 PM by insane_cratic_gal
along with Nelson.

I hope not, since she leans left on domestic/social issues

She voted to confirm Owens.. I'm sure she'll go support Alito she votes with the repukes 76 percent of the time anyway

NPR note: Landrieu and Byrd were the only Democrats to vote to confirm the previously filibustered Priscilla Owen to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5080836
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
54. Bringing up the assault case now
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 11:58 AM by Viva_La_Revolution
How anyone could rule against this guy because of his lawyer...

Obviously has no heart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
55. SMACK DOWN!
Brought up Alito comparing discrimination based on race to being left-handed. Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
57. Looked for a caring heart case after case and could not find one in Alito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
58. 1 hour to the repugs now Cornyn up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
59. NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
It's John "Box-turtle love" Cornyn. Eeeeeeeeeeep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #59
68. Damn! I thought I had that little icon stored somewhere... but no.
It would be so appropriate right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
61. Cornyn just mentioned "...the next vacancy that * fills on the SC..."!!!
Oh gawd! I can't even think about it...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. That thought scares the crap out of me
...but it has crossed my mind that they will push another justice into retirement so that they can further stack the courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #66
114. Jeez. :shudder: eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #61
72. that is why having a waterloo right here and now is so damn important
I hope that the remainder of the court are stronger than that and can out last this moran and his minions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
62. this twit doesnt represent me
im going to the store. ptttttttttt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
63. Cornyn is a total jack-ass
before he even gets rolling on his chat he basically says that Alito is a done deal and will be confirmed!!!

AAAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH!!!! God I hate these people!!!!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. So basically, if you oppose the Voting Rights Act...
that's not "judicial activism" that runs counter to what the Congress has passed as law? Only in Bizarro Box-Turtle World.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. WHY is he up? I thought it was the Dems turn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:09 PM
Original message
1 hour each, back and forth
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 12:10 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Now would be the time to grab a snack or get something done. LOL

I think they will also be breaking for lunch at 12:30 IIRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
78. Fast hour wasn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogmi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
64. Go whip the party Dick. IL thanks you. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
69. Talking about unitary executive...calling it an academic theory.
Saying it *supports* the idea of the balance of powers.

Saying that detractors say that it was Scalia's idea. Has anyone heard anybody say that? I haven't. This is a red herring, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
71. Can someone please explain
the yes/no votes on the left side of the screen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. these are just the declared votes so far. Not official yet n/t
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 12:10 PM by bear425
edit: official vote not scheduled yet

LOL Cornyn just called him ScAlito!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #74
115. and I call him Borklito...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. Those are the "votes" already announced
or the way they intend to vote and have said so publicly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #76
98. Can still wake up, tho!! Call Sen. Ben Nelson (NE) 1-202-224-6551
Did I mention, PLEASE call Nelson and let him know he's DONE? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
73. Call Ben Nelson (NE) 1-202-224-6551
Let him know we are watching, and that he is DONE if he votes for this EXTREMIST!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadJohnShaft Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:11 PM
Original message
Called - She'll pass that along for me. 'Can you do it now?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
91. I keep getting the same response, have been calling for two days, but I am
FURIOUS, and I told her to let him know that he's done as a DEM! Probably not very diplomatic, but I am SOOOOO tired of the nice-nice game!
:puke: BTW, Cornyn makes me sick-I am waiting for him to refer to poor Mrs. Alito and her crocodile tears!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #73
84. Toll free numbers to call through the switchboard:
Toll free numbers to call your Senators
888 818-6641, 888 355-3588 or 800 426-8073

When the operator answers, just tell them who you want to speak with, and they will connect you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #84
113. Here is additional contact info for Senator Ben Nelson:
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 12:42 PM by Wordie
Phone: (202)224-6551 (Washington D.C.)

http://www.senate.gov/~bennelson/contact/email.cfm

FAX: (202) 228-0012

He is the only Dem Senator who has said he will vote for Alito.

Contact him to urge him to reconsider!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #73
107. I think that's considered treason on DU.
P.S. I already did.

I'm not campaigning, I'm just saying I will not vote for Ben Nelson in November.

The Nebraska Democratic Party will know it.

I will WITHDRAW my monthly donation from the state Democrats and contribute directly to candidates who really do represent me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #107
112. Good for you, and thanks, LiberalAndProud!!
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
75. LOL...he just slipped and called Alito, "Scalito" LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #75
81. omg! i just heard that! i was gonna post it!
hey repukes! that's what WE call the guy--i guess they call him that too, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA02 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #75
89. He did that at the hearings, too. (Link to vid here)
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 12:16 PM by UCLA02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
77. Heeeee...Cornyn called him "Scalito"
*snort*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. I snorted at that too! That was damn funny! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogmi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #77
90. For Real?
I thought that was just a glitch in the video stream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. for real - they have adopted the nickname as a badge of honor n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ovett Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
79. True that Scalia dissented against O'Connor on Hamdy?
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 12:11 PM by Ovett
Confirming Bush's right to keep US Citizens detained indefinitely who are suspected of terrorism? That is Scalia said he could not, but O'Connor said he could, according to Cornyn. Scalia the originator of unitary executive theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA02 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #79
111. In all fairness...
Scalia would require a habeas hearing for a citizen designated an enemy combatant, O'Connor would not. Also, this decision was a plurality, meaning no single point of view got a majority. Check out the strange alliances:

O'Connor/Rehnquist/Kennedy/Breyer--plurality opinion
Souter/Ginsburg--concurring and dissenting in part
Scalia/Stevens--dissenting
Thomas--dissenting

Check it out at 542 US 507

"If civil rights are to be curtailed during wartime, it must be done openly and democratically, as the Constitution requires, rather than by silent erosion through an opinion of this Court." --Scalia's dissent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
83. A ringing endorsement from Cornyn
"Judge Alito doesn't believe in an all powered presidency than Justice Scalia does"!

He just calmed all my fears.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
85. Someone explain to Cornyn...
that the 20 percent of the time O'Connor disagreed with Rehnquist were really fucking important cases.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
86. I thought the little guy was fictional Cornyn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. Not fictional - unborn as yet - that's what they said yesterday anyway nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #87
96. So he's really confused now.
Which is it Cornyn...when does one count as a little guy? At conception? below the Poverty Line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. Only until they draw their first breath, then they don't count anymore nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #87
103. It seems the dems are prepared for the "so called little guy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. mythical
The little guy is mythical

like unicorns, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
92. a jury can't do that if there is no jury Cornyn!
:puke: If he thinks sympathy is never in play in a court room, he is sadly mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
94. Cornyn was a judge, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
95. Oh...save me from the scary liberals...
they'll let criminals run free, take your money, kick your dog, and make you eat unbaptised babies. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #95
100. my utopia - looting of the treasury? So THIS is heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #100
105. didn't you know...
looting the treasury is just fine as long as you give the money to oil companies and defense contractors and not the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
99. Dittohead Allen now! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
102. Thread 4 is up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
104. It's Howdy Doody Time. It's Howdy Doody Time.
Nuh nuh nuh nuhnuhnuh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #104
110. He's not howdy doody - the little shit from Florida is
Looks just like him and they only break him out when they need someone to wear a bullseye and won't bleed when hit in critical mass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
106. Rank hypocracy from George Allen
Yeah, let's talk about all the Clinton nominees who never got an up or down vote.

And the Dems don't have to "reserve the right to fillibuster". That have that right you putz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
108. George Allen
Filibuster - "bring it on", he is such a peckerhead. Who cares about checks and balances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
109. Allen threatening nuclear option. Says "make my day"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #109
116. That remark made me think there must be something
brewing under the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC