Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid and other Democrats should go back to calling it spying on Americans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:05 PM
Original message
Reid and other Democrats should go back to calling it spying on Americans
Labeling Bush's warrantless eavesdropping 'domestic spying' has us in a word game like the difference between lying and misled.

Just say it plain. The NSA is spying on Americans.


And, how did all of the data-mining that's been done turn into a 'limited program. Why is Bush able to defend the one set of instances of spying on Americans and get away without answering for the other abuses that have been uncovered?

What about Bush answering for the NSA spying on the anti-war group from Baltimore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. media changed it. i dont know if the democrats have. but you are
right, that was again done purposely. i always say spying on americans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. there was this petty response from the WH to Reid. Scotty got hit about it
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 12:39 PM by bigtree
here's the WH (response?) to Sen. Reid:

Setting the Record Straight: Charges Of "Domestic Spying"

Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) Calls The NSA Program A "Domestic Spying Program." "That is why Americans of all backgrounds and political parties are concerned about the NSA's domestic spying program." (Sen. Harry Reid, Press Release, 1/23/06)

But The President's Authorization Only Covers International Communications In Which One Party Is Suspected Of Links To Al Qaeda Or Related Terrorist Organizations.

* Deputy Director Of National Intelligence General Michael Hayden: "One End Of Any Call Targeted Under This Program Is Always Outside The United States." GEN. HAYDEN: "I don't think domestic spying makes it. One end of any call targeted under this program is always outside the United States. I've flown a lot in this country, and I've taken literally hundreds of domestic flights. I have never boarded a domestic flight in the United States of America and landed in Waziristan. In the same way - and I'm speaking illustratively here now, this is just an example - if NSA had intercepted al Qaeda Ops Chief Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in Karachi talking to Mohamed Atta in Laurel, Maryland, in say, July of 2001 - if NSA had done that, and the results had been made public, I'm convinced that the crawler on all the 7 by 24 news networks would not have been 'NSA domestic spying.'" (General Michael Hayden, Remarks, Washington, DC, 1/23/06)

DEFINITION: Domestic Vs. International.

* Domestic Calls are calls inside the United States. International Calls are calls either to or from the United States.
* Domestic Flights are flights from one American city to another. International Flights are flights to or from the United States.
* Domestic Mail consists of letters and packages sent within the United States. International Mail consists of letters and packages sent to or from the United States.
* Domestic Commerce involves business within the United States. International Commerce involves business between the United States and other countries.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060124-4.html


real petty and childish. word games. we shouldn't play
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. but.... we dont believe bush. we dont believe there has always
been an international call. that is what we are challenging. that is what fisa need to see if all calls has one international. i dont believe that is true. i believe there was spying on american, domestic...... not international. bush,.... prove it. with no oversight, why would i trust?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. right. we don't really believe he restricted the spying to these calls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. You have an excellent point.
The symantics drive me nuts....I don't care if it was calls/emails to other countries or within the states - those being spied upon are American citizens and are protected (supposedly) by laws.

But have the Dems stopped calling it spying on Americans? I think it's the media who've adopted the word game as usual, to obfuscate and spin in favor of the WH. They certainly aren't talking about data mining and Quakers, etc. being spied upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans
Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans / Spying on Americans/ Spying on Americans /.....

You get the idea :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good point...
And let the Repubs know that they can call it whatever they want or they can change what they call it as many times as they like, but we will continue to call it "spying on Americans"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. and/or snooping
I liked the way they did it on Boston Legal last night. Reminding people how much of their information is easily accessible and expanding it to include NSA and Echelon, all snooping into people's private business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC