Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harpers: Foley scandal is no “October Surprise”, they had story last May

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 02:53 PM
Original message
Harpers: Foley scandal is no “October Surprise”, they had story last May
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 02:59 PM by sabra

http://www.harpers.org/sb-republicans-1160492797.html

Republicans Want to Turn Over a New Page
The Foley scandal is no “October Surprise”

Posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006. By Ken Silverstein.

Leading Republicans, with the support of conservative media outlets, are charging that the Mark Foley scandal was a plot orchestrated by Democrats to damage the G.O.P.'s electoral prospects this November. According to the Washington Post, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert appeared on Rush Limbaugh's radio show and “agreed when the host said the Foley story was driven by Democrats ‘in some sort of cooperation with some in the media’ to suppress turnout of conservative voters” before the midterm elections.

...

The Republican leadership is lying when they claim that Democrats have engineered an “October Surprise”; there was never a plan undermine the G.O.P. or to destroy Hastert personally, as the speaker has vaingloriously suggested. I know this with absolute certainty because Harper’s was offered the story almost five months ago and decided, after much debate, not to run it here on Washington Babylon.

...

It was a Democrat who brought me the emails, but comments he made and common sense strongly suggest they were originally leaked by a Republican office. And while it's entirely possible that Democratic officials became aware of the accusations against Foley, the source was not working in concert with the national Democratic Party. This person was genuinely disgusted by Foley's behavior, amazed that other publications had declined to publish stories about the emails, and concerned that Foley might still be seeking contact with pages.

...

We decided against publishing the story because we didn't have absolute proof that Foley was, as one editor put it, “anything but creepy.” At the time I was disappointed that the story was killed—but I must confess that I was also a bit relieved because there had been the possibility, however unlikely, that I would wrongly accuse Foley of improper conduct.

...

It is now absolutely clear that Foley was indeed a menace to kids working on Capitol Hill. In seeking to malign the parties who sought to expose his conduct, top Republicans reveal that they are far more outraged by the possibility that the scandal might harm their party’s prospects in November than they are by Foley's behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick cause this exposes Hasterts lies...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick.
Good article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's more info on this Repuke lie:
Group fires back Spectator claim they held Foley email

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Group_fires_back_Spectator_claim_they_1010.html

It seems like the Repukes are blaming others for holding on to this info just to fuck up the mid-term elections for them. Why can't Repukes take any RESPONSIBILITY????? Are they ALL like George Bush???

GMAFB! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hastert appears on Rush ‘in some sort of cooperation with the media’
What's news about that?

Oh, sorry... I misread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's worse than lies.
From what I understand, Hastert really believes--all evidence to the contrary--the BS about a Democratic October surprise. The man two heartbeats away from the presidency is so paranoid that he thinks Democrats secretly control the Republicans and lapdog press from behind the green curtain. Bush is arrogant and dumb, but Hastert seems to be just plain nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC