Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proof that Bush Deserves Full Blame for N.K. Nuclear Test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 05:43 PM
Original message
Proof that Bush Deserves Full Blame for N.K. Nuclear Test
Bush's (Not Clinton's) "Neglect Set Stage For Kim's Move

NEWS ANALYSIS
Diverted Attention, Neglect Set the Stage for Kim's Move
Up until 2001, North Korea's nuclear program was largely under seal and monitored by the U.N. What went wrong?
By Barbara Demick, Times Staff Writer
October 10, 2006



Conservatives quickly point to Clinton's agreements with Kim Jong Il, saying Clinton was too nice, and allowed North Korea easy access to the material needed for making nuclear weapons. This statement is only partially true. Clinton did not successfully prevent North Korea from sustaining a uranium-based program, which, as the article notes, "is an alternative technology easier to keep hidden." But Clinton did make efforts to prevent North Korea from acquiring plutonium-based nuclear weapons (and I think he did a pretty bang-up job):


Little more than four years ago, the North Korean nuclear weapons program was largely under lock and key, the threat seen as a fleeting crisis of a previous decade.

North Korea's main nuclear center at Yongbyon, 60 miles north of Pyongyang, was monitored 24 hours a day by U.N. surveillance cameras. International inspectors lived near the site. Seals were in place over key nuclear installations and a nuclear reactor at Yongbyon was gathering dust.



The problem for Bush is that the bomb detonated on Sunday wasn't uranium-based; it was plutonium based. Understand this, and you realize that it wasn't until President Bush came into office and stopped dialogue with North Korea, that the excrement really hit the fan: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/10/10/18221/590



Assistant Secretary of State James A. Kelly was told by a North Korean official that the North was cheating on its nuclear freeze obligations by conducting secretive research into highly enriched uranium.

...The Bush administration moved hastily to punish North Korea by cutting off shipments of fuel oil that had been pledged under the Agreed Framework.

Within weeks, the North Koreans put tape over the surveillance cameras at Yongbyon and broke the seals on their nuclear installations. By New Year's Eve, the U.N. inspectors were escorted out of North Korea.

... the United States ended up in effect throwing away a deal that had kept the more immediately threatening plutonium production facility at Yongbyon in check.

... Once the U.N. inspectors were gone, North Korea wasted no time. By mid-2003, it had repaired its mothballed nuclear reactor and cranked up the reprocessing plant where weapons-grade plutonium was extracted from spent fuel rods.



http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-wrong10oct10,1,3585288.story?coll=la-headlines-world&ctrack=1&cset=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Important piece of info there, kpete.
Kick! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's important that this information is seen...
Edited on Tue Oct-10-06 06:19 PM by im10ashus
widely by the voters. Here's another article I came across today from 2002:

US grants N Korea nuclear funds

The US Government has announced that it will release $95m to North Korea as part of an agreement to replace the Stalinist country's own nuclear programme, which the US suspected was being misused.
Under the 1994 Agreed Framework an international consortium is building two proliferation-proof nuclear reactors and providing fuel oil for North Korea while the reactors are being built.

In releasing the funding, President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors to ensure it has not hidden away any weapons-grade plutonium from the original reactors.

President Bush argued that the decision was "vital to the national security interests of the United States".

Cont'd...


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1908571.stm


I posted it earlier to very little notice. :-)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2362546
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If only the inane US media would cover it
Thanks for reposting. This is damned important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "If only the inane US media would cover it"
If only.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. we wouldn't be taken over by fascists now.
just completing the sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If only it weren't for "activist:" judges.
Just completing the circle.

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Needs to be said, read, and SPREAD!
Because there's an avalanche of "blame Clinton" rumbling down the mountainsides everywhere, as the near-desperate republi-CONS resort to ANYTHING to take your mind off their screw-ups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. When David Gregory sees the LA Times article you link, he'll want a
"do-over" of his extremely poor questioning of Tony Snow at today's WH press briefing.

See my earlier thread at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2361272
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC