ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:47 PM
Original message |
I think I know why the dems won't filibuster |
|
I think they are afraid of triggering a "Constitutional Crisis" if they do.
In other words, it would go something like this:
Dems filibuster Repubs pull "nuc option" Dems walk out Senate shuts down Bush assumes "emergency powers" Democracy goes bye-bye
Thoughts?
|
deutsey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We're already in a Constitutional crisis, but your scenario would |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
2. democracy will be gone if they don't stand up |
|
why would the dems walk out if they pull the "nuc option"?
In fact if we take back congress in november, it will make US more powerful
It is time to stop being afraid, otherwise the democrats are part of the problem
|
jackstraw45
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
3. So basically your theory is that the Dems are scared and weak? |
|
Bullied into fear by "King George" and his thugs?
If there was EVER a time to take a stand, THIS is their chance. This is a GENERATIONAL vote, a GENERATIONAL decision.
I will lose ALL faith in this party if they choose not to filibuster just to "score some points" against an already dangerous and unpopular "president."
|
smartvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
4. We're already in a crisis. nt |
hwmnbn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
5. and then the second american revolution begins...... |
|
to overthrow a despotic ruler.
We did it before, we can do it again. I say let's get it over with.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
armed with the truth, and a copy of the constitution. i can't understand why using the constitution as it was written, to solve exactly the problems we face, is a crisis. it is a crisis if we role over. not if legislators do what they have taken an oath to do. ferchrissakes.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Except the Dems wouldn't walk out -- they'd stop "unanimous consent" |
|
... and bring the Senate to a crawl by insisting that it operate according to its own Rules. Every "unanimous consent" request is, in essence, a suspension of the Senate Rules - including dispensation of a full reading of all legislation, the ability to "revise and extend" remarks and create a "Record" that doesn't actually reflect floor proceedings, and a host of other 'fast lane' evasions of the Rules.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Bush is already assuming emergency powers, remember? |
|
We're at "war" on terra.
This is already happening so it's no reason to avoid a fillibuster.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
8. It doesn't have to go that far (and there's no reason it would). |
|
A more likely scenario:
Dems filibuster Repubs pull nuclear option Alito is confirmed Business as usual (possibly after some show of dissatisfaction by the Dems)
No need for the progression to Bush assuming emergency powers.
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Dems HAVE to filibuster |
|
There is not a choice on this...
And, the repukes won't nuclear option.
A constitutional crisis occured when Bush declared himself above the law and then nominated Alito to 'reinterpret' the constitution to give him dictatorial powers.
CALL YOUR SENATORS, NOW.
CALL EVERY SENATOR.
NO ON ALITO AND A FILIBUSTER
PERIOD
|
Ioo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What the dems will do it not shut down the senate, they will slow it down to a crawl, and here is how...
They have these things called "agreements", like, the Senate rules say that all bills must be read aloud, but both have agreed that this is not needed. The dems will ask that every bill be read... this will take over a week on some of these bills, 3000 page bills take some time to read.
Dems will also call for a roll call vote on EVERYTHING, including the motion to end for the day.
The dems will take turns sitting on the floor and making sure EVERY single rule is followed. This is not a crisis this is the rules...
|
kerry-is-my-prez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
11. They are afraid of losing their jobs- period. They will go with the polls |
|
and what they see their constituents as wanting. The only politicians who go against that or vote their conscience are the ones who aren't worried about re-election.
|
bullimiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
12. is it better to let liberty bleed to death a drop at a time because |
|
they are too scared to fight?
|
understandinglife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Our "Constitutional Crisis" began on 9 Dec 2000 when Scalia stopped ... |
|
... the recount. The Dems should filibuster, force the "nuc option" (which I think several Repubs would be reluctant to support), walk out of SOTU, but there is no reason for them to either shut down the Senate or leave town. Even if the repubs succeed with the "nuc option" when the Dems take control of the Senate in 2007 (which they will if they will just fight Bush and the neoconsters), the Dems can restore that Senate rule.
They should be working closely with their colleagues in the House and in the States to bring Articles of Impeachment against (at a minimum) Bush, Cheney, Rice, Gonzales and Rumsfeld.
At some point, when we have restored our government I personally intend to dedicate resources toward the impeachment of Scalia from SCOTUS.
Peace.
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Let's stop the charade that America is a Democracy and open it up for all to see. That way, at least people won't have delusions of living in Democracy anymore.
Americans have slept through the death of their democracy. It's time someone woke them up.
|
Democrats_win
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Americans have been afraid of Rethugs for 50 years. McCarthy, Nixon, Reag |
|
an, bush1&2. They should have been banned years ago for what they've done.
|
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
One Dem filibusters... All Dems oppose this one no walkout no nuke option. no shut down emergency power continue by Bush. Democracy is long gone...
|
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Democracy will go bye-bye if they don't filibuster Alito |
|
Albeit possibly at a slower pace.
This isn't a good excuse for not filibustering.
|
tjwash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Yeah, the "Dems are afraid" part is right. |
oc2002
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
20. they are damned if they do and damned if the do not. |
|
Corporate media will be out for blood, the Republicans will shout how obstructionists and anti-democractic the dems are by blocking the vote.
the only choice for anyone in congress now is, do you want to go down standing up fighting or on your knees kissing arse?
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Thanks for all the comments and opinions |
|
I'm thinking it would be a good thing if the Dems filibuster and force Frist to use the "nuclear option" (or in deference to their wonderful leader, the "new-cu-lar" option). We may lose the vote but we'd have something to beat the Repubs up with in the '06 elections.
Thoughts?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message |