Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think I know why the dems won't filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:47 PM
Original message
I think I know why the dems won't filibuster
I think they are afraid of triggering a "Constitutional Crisis" if they do.

In other words, it would go something like this:

Dems filibuster
Repubs pull "nuc option"
Dems walk out
Senate shuts down
Bush assumes "emergency powers"
Democracy goes bye-bye

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. We're already in a Constitutional crisis, but your scenario would
certainly exacerbate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. democracy will be gone if they don't stand up
why would the dems walk out if they pull the "nuc option"?

In fact if we take back congress in november, it will make US more powerful

It is time to stop being afraid, otherwise the democrats are part of the problem


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. So basically your theory is that the Dems are scared and weak?
Bullied into fear by "King George" and his thugs?

If there was EVER a time to take a stand, THIS is their chance. This is a GENERATIONAL vote, a GENERATIONAL decision.

I will lose ALL faith in this party if they choose not to filibuster just to "score some points" against an already dangerous and unpopular "president."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. We're already in a crisis. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. and then the second american revolution begins......
to overthrow a despotic ruler.

We did it before, we can do it again. I say let's get it over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. armed and ready!
armed with the truth, and a copy of the constitution.
i can't understand why using the constitution as it was written, to solve exactly the problems we face, is a crisis. it is a crisis if we role over. not if legislators do what they have taken an oath to do.
ferchrissakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Except the Dems wouldn't walk out -- they'd stop "unanimous consent"
... and bring the Senate to a crawl by insisting that it operate according to its own Rules. Every "unanimous consent" request is, in essence, a suspension of the Senate Rules - including dispensation of a full reading of all legislation, the ability to "revise and extend" remarks and create a "Record" that doesn't actually reflect floor proceedings, and a host of other 'fast lane' evasions of the Rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush is already assuming emergency powers, remember?
We're at "war" on terra.

This is already happening so it's no reason to avoid a fillibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. It doesn't have to go that far (and there's no reason it would).
A more likely scenario:

Dems filibuster
Repubs pull nuclear option
Alito is confirmed
Business as usual (possibly after some show of dissatisfaction by the Dems)


No need for the progression to Bush assuming emergency powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dems HAVE to filibuster

There is not a choice on this...

And, the repukes won't nuclear option.

A constitutional crisis occured when Bush declared himself above the law and then nominated Alito to 'reinterpret' the constitution to give him dictatorial powers.

CALL YOUR SENATORS, NOW.

CALL EVERY SENATOR.

NO ON ALITO AND A FILIBUSTER

PERIOD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here is the thing...
What the dems will do it not shut down the senate, they will slow it down to a crawl, and here is how...

They have these things called "agreements", like, the Senate rules say that all bills must be read aloud, but both have agreed that this is not needed. The dems will ask that every bill be read... this will take over a week on some of these bills, 3000 page bills take some time to read.

Dems will also call for a roll call vote on EVERYTHING, including the motion to end for the day.

The dems will take turns sitting on the floor and making sure EVERY single rule is followed. This is not a crisis this is the rules...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. They are afraid of losing their jobs- period. They will go with the polls
and what they see their constituents as wanting. The only politicians who go against that or vote their conscience are the ones who aren't worried about re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. is it better to let liberty bleed to death a drop at a time because
they are too scared to fight?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Our "Constitutional Crisis" began on 9 Dec 2000 when Scalia stopped ...
... the recount. The Dems should filibuster, force the "nuc option" (which I think several Repubs would be reluctant to support), walk out of SOTU, but there is no reason for them to either shut down the Senate or leave town. Even if the repubs succeed with the "nuc option" when the Dems take control of the Senate in 2007 (which they will if they will just fight Bush and the neoconsters), the Dems can restore that Senate rule.

They should be working closely with their colleagues in the House and in the States to bring Articles of Impeachment against (at a minimum) Bush, Cheney, Rice, Gonzales and Rumsfeld.

At some point, when we have restored our government I personally intend to dedicate resources toward the impeachment of Scalia from SCOTUS.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. BRING IT ON!
Let's stop the charade that America is a Democracy and open it up for all to see. That way, at least people won't have delusions of living in Democracy anymore.

Americans have slept through the death of their democracy. It's time someone woke them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Americans have been afraid of Rethugs for 50 years. McCarthy, Nixon, Reag
an, bush1&2. They should have been banned years ago for what they've done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. except
One Dem filibusters... All Dems oppose this one
no walkout
no nuke option.
no shut down
emergency power continue by Bush.
Democracy is long gone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Democracy will go bye-bye if they don't filibuster Alito
Albeit possibly at a slower pace.

This isn't a good excuse for not filibustering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, the "Dems are afraid" part is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. they are damned if they do and damned if the do not.

Corporate media will be out for blood, the Republicans will shout how obstructionists and anti-democractic the dems are by blocking the vote.

the only choice for anyone in congress now is, do you want to go down standing up fighting or on your knees kissing arse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thanks for all the comments and opinions
I'm thinking it would be a good thing if the Dems filibuster and force Frist to use the "nuclear option" (or in deference to their wonderful leader, the "new-cu-lar" option). We may lose the vote but we'd have something to beat the Repubs up with in the '06 elections.

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC