Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Expose the "Alito 8" Democratic Senators Who Are Blocking a Filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:38 PM
Original message
Expose the "Alito 8" Democratic Senators Who Are Blocking a Filibuster
Sorry if this is old info, I thought it was interesting & am calling the 7 suspects NOW! Kpete)

Expose the "Alito 8" Democratic Senators Who Are Blocking a Filibuster
By Bob Fertik
Created 2006-01-25 09:54

Harry Reid met with progressive lobbyists on Tuesday and told them he has nearly 44 votes against Alito, but there are 8 Democratic Senators who will not support a filibuster.

Only 41 votes are needed for a filibuster. If Reid has 41 votes against Alito, every one of those Senators should support a filibuster or their vote against Alito is meaningless.

Reid also said he will not pressure Democratic Senators on Alito because it's a "conscience vote."

Bullshit. The Constitution - not to mention young women - are tied to the railroad track and the train that will kill them is named Samuel Alito.

Reid would not name the "Alito 8" - so we need to expose them and tell them we will remember in November.

Use these toll free numbers to call the Capitol: 888-355-3588 or 888-818-6641

The most likely suspects are the 7 Democrats in the Gang of 14.

Joseph I. Lieberman, Connecticut
Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia
E. Benjamin Nelson, Nebraska
Mary Landrieu, Louisiana
Daniel Inouye, Hawaii
Mark Pryor, Arkansas
Ken Salazar, Colorado

Ben Nelson has already said he will vote for Alito. Screw him, but we don't need his vote as long as we get nearly all of the rest.

You can also call the 5 Republicans who have not declared their support for Alito:

Lamar Alexander (TN)
Lincoln Chafee (RI)
Susan Collins (ME)
Olympia Snowe (ME)
Ted Stevens (AK)


And call the five Democratic Senators who want you to support them for President in 2008. If they want to prove their leadership, they need to lead the filibuster. It only takes 1 Senator to start the filibuster. Call them with a simple message: SUPPORT A FILIBUSTER OR FORGET ABOUT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

Evan Bayh
Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton
Russ Feingold
John Kerry


http://www.democrats.com/node/7525
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I will call all of them right now - thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Naw. It's the Elito 44. How will we know the '8' if the rest don't act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. We have Jeffords - I think he will support a filibuster

So, we have to get 4 more senators.

Please, everyone. CALL NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I just got off the phone with Reid's office - NO plan for a filibuster
that she knows of. I asked the question two different ways - same response.

They are going to Oppose him, but not Filibuster him (that she know of).

Sonofabitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe a good way to flush out the traitors
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 01:45 PM by mmonk
is to tell your Senator you won't support him or her if there isn't a filibuster. That may provoke listing the traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. If it's true
Then all 8 need to be targeted- preferably in a primary- but if not- then in a general election. Better for the party in the long term view to demonstrate that there are consequence for acting against not only the party's interests, but the interests of pretty much all Ameicans (whether their too ignorant or just plain stupid) to see it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. um, ok, i agree about the primaries,
but how do you propose to weed them out in the general elections? by voting third party or not voting at all? so in effect you just cast a vote for a republican who also supported alito. therefore you just cut off your nose to spite your face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. There has to be some accountability
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 05:04 PM by depakid
And if there's not- that in fact ends up being the equivalent of cutting off your nose to spite your face- because it weakens the party and keeps them from EVER being able to block anything- much less get anything done.

It legitimizes and enables Republican policies- and that hurts other candidates anywhere.

The bottom line is that unless and until the Dems either

A. find some discipline to reign in the DINOs or

B. Citizen decide that they're not going to vote back in someone who date rapes them repeatedly- even if it means seating a Republican for the short term

they will remain in the minority for the foreseable future. DINO's abuse progresives for different reasons than Republicans do. Basically they believe we have no where else to go- so they can take the money and be a corrupt and destructive as they like...

Well, that's not true- and you just watch and see whether if Alito gets in, there won't be some backlash in 2006. I for one will be sending a little money and maybe writing a LTTE or two in favor of their opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. You're right about accountability...
I just don't know if that is the answer, right now. Any other time, maybe. But the Republican party of today is just plain dangerous. These people are not Republicans. They are not Conservatives. They are the American Nazi Party, and honestly, they scare me.

I understand what you are saying, and to a large extent I agree with you, it's just that these Republicans need to be stopped. They really scare me, not the "turrists", them and their Dear Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh well,
maybe next life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVK Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I called Ben Nelson's office.
I was born and raised in Nebraska.

Also called my own state senator Mark Dayton supporting a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. k&r Need one more for greatest page. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sad day.
Makes me wish I hadn't of had children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. If you really feel that way you should seek therapy
Because your kids will pick up on it and they deserve better than carrying the burden of your hangups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #35
53. kids deal better with hard cold reality
than they do with being shielded from the truth. It's not a 'hangup' to be depressed about the world situation today. Families and communities need to start using collective power. Crying on a therapist's shoulder is not going to give you that sense of empowerment. It's even more isolating and guilt-producing.

Obviously this could be a separate topic. But you are touching on something important. It may help to explain why we (intelligent liberals) have a hard time harnessing any group power against the Right--who depend on the blind herding instincts of the Sheeple. We often negate our own feelings and anger and can't channel it effectively, leading to frustration and depression. On the plus side, I see that passivity changing--as more who think like us are speaking out and not taking it anymore. That will help those who (understandably) express feelings of depression more than being told to negate those feelings will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. wishing your kids had not been born is NEVER a healthy
thing for your kids to know no matter WHAT the hangup is that brought you there. And BTW - FUCK your condescending back-hand implications concerning my backbone, liberal and/or mental credentials. Not only are you way out of line, I believe you overestimate yourself in general.

You honestly assert that conveying to ones children an attitude and belief that their existence is regrettable to you is healthy for the child. I cannot decide if this view reflects sickness, denial, sociopathy or pure convenience on your part.

Your logic bursts into flame on re-entry. Regret your life and children! Yay! Even though we know depression paralyzes normal function and normal life, DO NOT speak to a professional or any trusted person who could help you, BOOOOOOOOO. Continue being depressed. Yay! Wait for some newbie intelligent liberal (in parentheses) to set the world straight........ priceless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. suggest u see a professional
about that anger management problem.

Ask your therapist if they can find anything personally insulting to you or inflammatory in my post. You are howling at ghosts of your imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. This shows how poor Reid is as a leader of a doomed party.

by not filibustering it shows just how hollow the soul of the Democratic Congressman realy is. they are not even worthy of my contempt.

we should not have to be calling them, they should be ACTING AS LEADERS not SHEEP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. That is NOT the spirit
NEVER give up - get mad - act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Getting right on it, kpete. thanks! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. If there is not a filibuster, it is 100% Harry Reid's fault.
Pat Leahy said on Ed Schultz that the decision to filibuster lies with Reid. If one doesn't happen, you know who to blame - along with the spoiler senators who would not support one. But Reid should take the lion's share of the guilt - what the fuck use is a "party leader" who can't lead his party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. Nah, Reid's doing a great job, imho. I really trust that man.
He's gotten it right so many times in the past, that I am confident he's doing everything he can to take Alito down. He can't apply too much pressure on this one, because it's not supposed to be a partisan decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I very much hope you're right
I see a lot more bullshit on DU tonight - more proactive bashing of Democrats about a filibuster that hasn't even happened yet. It boggles my mind how some here can blame John Kerry for not filibustering when a) we don't even know if there will be a filibuster and b) if there is one, we need 41 VOTES and that will be REID'S DECISION TO MAKE. I think those who care more about bashing one of our most liberal Senators instead of doing everything they can to fight Alito (ie, contacting the Senators on the fence about a filibuster) have some definitely non-liberal agendas going on.

(BTW, that was a general rant, not at ALL directed at you - I've seen how tireless you've been opposing Alito here on DU.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. It may be exhaustion, as much as anything, that leads to the negativity.
I've been feeling it, too, at times (the Salazar announcement really got to me). Then I just think of how great the Dems did with the Patriot Act, and that was last minute if anything ever was. And everyone had said that was a lost cause too.

It seems that we shouldn't be bashing any Dems at all. It's the Republicans who should be blamed, and perhaps msm as well, with all the rosy "Alito's a great guy" and "It's a done deal" stuff they've been running.

But as long as Reid doesn't say it's ruled out, I'm going to assume it's a possibility. So, all we can do at this point is keep trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. You're right.
Thanks for being so positive and hopeful - you helped lift my spirits a little. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Well, thank you, too! :) eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. I like Reid, too.
Perhaps he's holding his cards VERY close to his vest? Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Max Cherry Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. calling........ THANKS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think that Alexander has already said Y to alito.
i saw it on the big board on c-span earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Just called Pryor's office and asked why he would refuse to filibuster.
The lady, hemmed and hawed, and started to say that he hadn't decided on which way he would vote (nomination) and then kind of implied it was because he was in the 'Group of 14'. I stopped her cold and said that the filibuster was a legitimate tool for a minority party and that I strongly urged the Senator to stand with the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. I met Mark Pryor's dad (David) on a few occasions when he was Senator
I got the distinct impression that David Pryor would not have put up with this kind of crap. Here is what he said about Robert Bork, for example: "But the question of Robert Bork is not an issue of a person being conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat. It is a larger question of temperament and understanding. " I hope Pryor Sr. is talking some sense into his son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Help me complete if you can
Joseph I. Lieberman, Connecticut
706 Hart Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-4041 Voice
(202) 224-9750 Fax

Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia
http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_email.html

E. Benjamin Nelson, Nebraska
Washington, D.C.
720 Hart Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Tel: (202) 224-6551
Fax: (202) 228-0012

Mary Landrieu, Louisiana
http://landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Daniel Inouye, Hawaii
Washington D.C.
722 Hart Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-1102
202-224-3934 Fax: 202-224-6747


Ken Salazar, Colorado
Washington, D.C.
U.S. Senator Ken Salazar
702 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-5852 main
(202) 228-5036 fax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. made all my calls, but Lieberman has voice mail on.
Added Durbin and Obama to support a philly-buster.
Landrieu's person was not at all pleasant. Rude, actually, when I congratulated her on her hard work and actions on Katrina. Then she broke in and demanded, "pro or con Alito?" Excuse me? "Pro or con, just tell me."

I tried to add lobby and finance reform to the conversation, but again with the "pro or con?"

I think she has been getting some pressure from less than nice people. Still, she should not be rude to all callers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. Call Democratic Senatorial Cam Com & DNC, too!
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (202-224-2447)
Democratic National Committee (202-863-8000)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. If this isn't proof that voting and supporting "moderate" Dems
Dinos, whatever you want to call them is de facto sleeping with the enemy then I don't know what is. I sure as shit ain't going to spend my time arguing with the DLC, "it's not that bad" "next election we can win" people on DU. You are deluded. I don't know what I'm gonna do-but this shit is a joke. And anybody that excuses and abets these people is shooting themselves. Politics is a fucking joke. Maybe I'll look at another country-would would you suggest? There is no oppostion party in this country. Not a "party." Not a group. Not with leaders. This vote for Alito-I'm the most pro-abortion person around-don't even need to be mealy mouthed about. BUT Roe v. Wade is nothing compared to the president having ABSOLUTE POWER. Unitary executive. "Signing statements" A King. The congress has no power now. It's getting worse every day.

He's already broken law and broken his oath of office and nothing is about it. And now these so called "democrats" are letting him appoint someone to the supreme court for life without fighting with everything they've got-that will give him absolute power in court cases-our only last line of defense against tryanny-and I'm supposed to say it's going to be okay? You must be insane. Because to think you are winning anything again with the Supreme court stacked you are seriously deluded. Game over.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. but.... we have all that lovely dry powder.
The big fight will be sometime in the future... follow the carrot... donate today... help us fight...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. We are talking about a fascist dictatorship in the making
and Alito would be an important part of that.

Let's keep calling the Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. ALL CONTACT INFO is on this thread:
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 02:52 PM by IndyOp
GANG OF 14:

Robert Byrd (WV)
311 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3954
Web Form: http://www.byrd.senate.gov/byrd_email.html

Daniel Inouye (HI)
722 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3934
Web Form: http://www.inouye.senate.gov/webform.html

Mary Landrieu (LA)
724 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5824
Web Form: http://www.landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Joseph Lieberman (CT)
706 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
Web Form: http://lieberman.senate.gov/contact /
(202) 224-4041

Ben Nelson (NE)
716 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5274
Web Form: http://www.billnelson.senate.gov/contact

Mark Pryor (AR)
217 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2353
Web Form: http://www.pryor.senate.gov/contact /

K. Salazar (CO)
UNITED STATES SENATE WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5852
Web Form: http://salazar.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Lincoln Chafee (RI)
141A Russell, Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-2921
Web Form: http://chafee.senate.gov/webform.htm

Susan Collins (ME)
461 Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-2523
Web Form: http://collins.senate.gov/public /

Olympia Snowe (ME)
154 Russell Senate Office Bldg., Washington DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-1946
WebForm: http://snowe.senate.gov/Webform.htm


TWO MODERATE REPUBLICANS WHO HAVEN'T ANNOUNCED THEIR VOTE & Jeffords

Lamar Alexander
302 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4944
Web Form: http://alexander.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home

Ted Stevens
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-3004
Webform: http://stevens.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Jim Jeffords
413 Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-5141
http://jeffords.senate.gov/contact.html

CORRECTED PHONE NUMBER 202-224-5141




PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS - TELL THEM TO LEAD THE FILIBUSTER!
Evan Bayh
463 Russell Building, Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-5623
Webform: http://bayh.senate.gov/LegForm.htm

Joe Biden
201 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: 202-224-5042
Webform: http://biden.senate.gov/contact/emailjoe.cfm

Hillary Clinton
476 Russell Senate Office Building,Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-4451
Webform: http://clinton.senate.gov/contact/webform.cfm

Senator Feingold
506 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510-4904
Phone: (202) 224-5323
Webform: http://feingold.senate.gov/contact.html

John Kerry
304 Russell Bldg. Washington D.C. 20510
(202) 224-2742
Webform: http://kerry.senate.gov/v3/contact/email.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thanks
I was getting tired, more coffee, phone in one hand - mouse in the other

"BRING IT ON"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. And don't forget you can use the Capitol Switchboard, toll-FREE
Capitol switchboard numbers:

1-888 355 3588
1-888 818 6641
1-877 851 6437

Just tell the operator which Senator you wish to speak to and you will be connected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larissa238 Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. I couldnt call them (Im at work)
So Im emailing all of them instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. Just called Hillary, John Kerry, and Joe Biden's offices
FILLIBUSTER!!!

It's not over until it's over - let's keep on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. Salazar has said he is voting against. See the Colorado forum
Thanks for tarring with a wide brush....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not_Giving_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
32. Done
Second time in two weeks....hopefully they are listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. Cross off Salazar--he's voting no (heard on Jay Marvin yesterday)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Just saw something that said he would not support a filibuster.
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 06:26 PM by Wordie
:(

So put Salazar at the top of your list to call and try to get him to change his mind!

Send him this:
(Dean of Univ. of Chicago Law School changes his mind about Alito)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/why-the-senate-should-not_b_14229.html

Or this:
ATTENTION SENATORS: The Road to the Presidency is Through LEADING An Alito Filibuster
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_thepen_060124_attention_senators_3a_.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Then his "NO" is meaningless and infact he favors Alito
without a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Oh, I agree! CALL him! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
41. Did Patty Murray of Washington indicate how she was voting?
Randi Rhodes mentioned that she may be on the fence as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
43. Kerry supports a filibuster and has a petition going on
Sign it if you haven't at johnkery.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. You know how sometimes your mind plays tricks when you read something
I read "Execute the Alito 8"...I thought, damn I'm pissed too, but couldn't we just stop at something simple like tar and feather and ride out of town on a rail?;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. LOL...it's *almost* come to that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Dupe...my apologies.
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 12:59 AM by Wordie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
50. kick to show WHERE to fax the NYT article!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
52. Good job, kpete! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
54. kick and THANKS!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
55. This was totally predictable,
and in fact, I predicted it. I feel just like Cassandra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
56. Fax Senate Democrats--Filibuster Alito
FAX Numbers for the US Senate Democrats

AR: Lincoln(D) (202) 228-1371
AR: Pryor(D) (202) 228-0908
CA: Boxer(D) (202) 226-6701
CA: Feinstein(D) (202) 228-3954
CO: Salazar(D) (202) 228-5036
CT: Dodd(D) (202) 224-1083
CT: Lieberman(D) (202) 224-9750
DE: Biden(D) (202) 224-0139
DE: Carper(D) (202) 228-2190
FL: Nelson(D) (202) 228-2183
HI: Akaka(D) (202) 224-2126
HI: Inouye(D) (202) 224-6747
IA: Harkin(D) (202) 224-9369
IL: Durbin(D) (202) 228-0400
IL: Obama(D) (202) 228-4260
IN: Bayh(D) (202) 228-1377
LA: Landrieu(D) (202) 224-9735
MA: Kennedy(D) (202) 224-2417
MA: Kerry(D) (202) 224-8525
MD: Mikulski(D) (202) 224-8858
MD: Sarbanes(D) (202) 224-1651
MI: Levin(D) (202) 224-1388
MI: Stabenow(D) (202) 228-0325
MN: Dayton(D) (202) 228-2186
MT: Baucus(D) (202) 224-0515
ND: Conrad(D) (202) 224-7776
ND: Dorgan(D) (202) 224-1193
NE: Nelson(D) (202) 228-0012
NJ: Corzine(D) (202) 228-2197
NJ: Lautenberg(D) (202) 224-9707
NM: Bingaman(D) (202) 224-2852
NV: Reid(D) (202) 224-7327
NY: Clinton(D) (202) 228-0282
NY: Schumer(D) (202) 228-3027
OR: Wyden(D) (202) 228-2717
RI: Reed(D) (202) 224-4680
SD: Johnson(D) (202) 228-0368
VT: Leahy(D) (202) 224-3595
VT: Jeffords(I) (202) 228-0776
WA: Cantwell(D) (202) 228-0514
WA: Murray(D) (202) 224-0238
WI: Feingold(D) (202) 224-2725
WI: Kohl(D) (202) 224-9787
WV: Rockefeller(D) (202) 224-7665
WV: Byrd(D) (202) 228-0002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farraday Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
57. It's too late. It' over.
Tim Johnson just announced that he is supporting the misogynist Alito. FUCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Albert Einstein Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
59. Feinstein is one of them. Spoke to her office.
Let's kick her out. She backed CAFTA and the war. Isn't it time we elected a Democrat to replace her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. No, Feinstein supports a filibuster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC