DaveJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-13-06 10:37 AM
Original message |
Why has Burns gained on Tester in Montana? |
|
Just glancing at electoral-vote.com and noticed that Tester's lead has gone from 6 points to only 4 points. Is there anything we should know about?? Tester is a progressive candidate, an organic farmer with ideas for bringing Montana into the future, while Burns has has an association with Jack Abramoff, runs smear campaigns, and has corporate money supporting his incumbency.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-13-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
1. A Two Point Move Is Statistically Insignificant.. |
DaveJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-13-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. We need to stay vigilant... |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-13-06 11:00 AM by djohnson
The other Senate races seem to be on the upswing for us according to the polls on EV. I thought there might be some Montanans that could help us rally more behind Tester. He is a bold candidate that deserves all of our support.
|
GregD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-13-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Need to narrow the polls so a BBV steal is less noticeable? |
rsmith6621
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-13-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-13-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Those changes are statistically meaningless. |
maxsolomon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-13-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message |
6. rubes don't pay attention till mid october |
|
there was a big debate on montana PBS on monday - hey looky! that's mah seenator on the tee vee!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |