Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Update: 14,000 People Demand Chris Wallace Ask Rice About The U.S.S. Cole

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:27 PM
Original message
Update: 14,000 People Demand Chris Wallace Ask Rice About The U.S.S. Cole
I just may tune into Foxs News this Sunday :rofl:

This morning, we suggested that readers email Chris Wallace and tell him to ask Condoleezza Rice the following question:

Prior to 9/11, you had eight months to respond to the al-Qaeda attack on the U.S.S. Cole. Why didn’t the Bush administration take action and put al-Qaeda out of business?

After all, Wallace asked President Clinton this question last month, even though the “CIA and the FBI refused to certify that Bin Laden was responsible” until early 2001, which foreclosed the possibility of a full response during the Clinton administration.

Also, Chris Wallace said he asked Clinton because “I got a lot of e-mail from viewers.” So far 10,000 people have emailed Wallace and told him to ask this question. Join this effort HERE.

We’ll monitor Fox News Sunday this weekend and let you know how Wallace responds.

UPDATE: As of 9PM, 14,000 people sent emails to Chris Wallace.

http://thinkprogress.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hee Hee - K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. We are watching Chris
Edited on Fri Oct-13-06 10:30 PM by proud patriot
are you a hypocrite ? Will you ask ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick'n ass and tak'n names! Right on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I predict the possibility of . . .
. . . a last minute emergency shoe-buying trip necessitating the cancellation of this interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. W's big project was getting a T-ball court built at the WH at the time
This should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. 14,001!
I can't wait to see the look on Condi's face when Chris Wallace asks the question his viewers want to hear the answer to. Either that, or to prove he is a bald-faced liar and Clinton was right. It's a win-win situation! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. 14,002!
:rofl: Eat it Condi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. 14,002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. er, you would be 14,003
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stella Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
29. Don`t hold your breath
you are going to be disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Done, kicked and rec'd
Thanks Catwoman.

Watching Condi squirm .... Priceless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ask her why she failed to hold a single meeting regarding al Qaeda
prior to 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tweety, please don't insult us by appearing on Jay Leno..
Edited on Fri Oct-13-06 10:50 PM by Tellurian
Trying your utmost best to come across as a good ole catholic boy
who went to parochial school. If you believe the Catholic School and Catholicism is any
kind of credential..as some holy right...you're a fool for fooling yourself.. You've been
in bed for a very long time with the wrong side, 6 yrs is a long time.. admit it Chris,
You were TOO scared to tell the Truth, and to a degree, I don't blame you.

Fear of losing your job because you favor unpopular opinions (The Truth) is dangerous business.

So, get off the fence now and be a real man..

Take a lesson from Olberman; he gets it!

How long is it going to take you to catch up?

Be forewarned..If you jump ship; theres no going back!

If you do, you will be the most hated Catholic boy on msnbc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Tweety? You're thinking of Chris Matthews.
Chris Wallace is the Faux tool who got his ass handed to him by the big dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Tweety reads us every now and then..
I thought he might be drawn to this thread, an therefore left
him a little note stating everything we know, that he doesn't know we know,
because it never occurred to him how much we know that he doesn't know we know.

You know, in case he drops in, he'll know we know..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Heh, heh, done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
photogirl12 Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Done
...and I hope he actually has the balls to ask her that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. That weasley little coward won't, but I'm tuning in nonetheless
:hi:

welcome to DU!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
photogirl12 Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thank you
...and I guess you are right, one can't grow balls overnight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
56. male body parts are not required for courage
you must already know that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
photogirl12 Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Yes,
but it is just a figure of speech. I should have called him spineless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Who could have ever imagined
that fox news would ask such a question?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Done! k&r
Bout time we held their feet to the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. I recomended but
I think you will be disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. He may ask, but her answer will most definitely be a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. No, it will be more sophisticated....
Condi will know in advance that the question is or might be coming, and she'll be ready with a carefully worded combination of half-truths, distortions, evasions, misleading statements, and weasel words. She'll sprinkle in outright lies only when necessary. It may not be necessary, because, as other DUers have pointed out, she can count on Wallace not to follow up her answer with any serious attempt to pin her down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. It's not the question that counts,
it's the followup to her stupid, obfuscating, jingoistic, spread the blame and give the old swatting flies excuse first answer.

My guess: he'll ask the question, then swallow whole those nuclear pellets that she lobs back.

SuperNuclearNanny--Chiding the Nations of the world into good behavior with her Authoritative whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
23. i don`t know about this question...i think it could backfire
"Although American intelligence officials moved quickly after the USS Cole attack, the investigation hit a number of Yemeni officials questioned more than 1,500 people, yet they restricted American officials' access to key suspects. In June 2001, FBI agents were pulled out of Yemen because of credible evidence that there was a terrorist threat against them. The FBI and U.S. State Department disagreed over how to steer the investigation and deal with the uncooperative Yemeni government. The U.S. government still could not prove that al-Qaeda was behind the attack, and they were concerned that several key operatives remained at large, possibly planning more attacks against American interests."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing
USS Cole bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia--check "Consequences and after-effects"


http://www.mipt.org/pdf/usscolecommission01092001.pdf
usscolecommission01092001.pdf (application/pdf Object)

http://www.cargolaw.com/2000nightmare_cole.html
Attack On The USS Cole (DDG-67)--check the "suspects"

bin boys ancestral home is the yemeni plus government just let all those in prison to "escape"! i`m not sure if anything could have been done after they took over the government in january of 2001 but several years later they did get the guys who were responsible.what the whitehouse failed at was stopping the possible 9/11 attack. that should have been the top focus in the whitehouse but saddam was far more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. Working on my email now, will post it later. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. Kick
Kick and email that weed Wallace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. here is the email link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
57. Remember to email before and after
When Wallace doesnt aks her that question, remember to email him and faux and the other MSM, if they think he is still fair and balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
28. done. Also asked him to ask her why she continues to deny the July10
meeting happened even though it's documented. And why she then did nothing.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. what a concept,
but the weisel won't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. Done!
With glee!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
32. After the shit Wallace (rightfully) got for the Clinton interview...
...I'd be willing to bet he'll ask her many, if not all those questions. And Rice will do what she does best (and often) - she'll lie right thru her gapped teeth.

We should start a Condi Rice drinking game: every time she starts a sentence with "Nobody could have known..." you have to take a drink.:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
33. Did zip - it didn't have her name on it
She needs more direct information before she can do anything, you know...seat numbers of terrorists...her name on the big boat...

http://tinyurl.com/byaha



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
34. At this point, doesn't matter. Her answer is already written for her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
36. Just added my name to the list...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
37. Let's see how honest that sniveling RW whore really is...
He has been asked by thousands...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
38. I want him to ask her about that July 2001 meeting with Tenet
at which she was told by Tenet that the threat of an attack inside the US was a "10 on a scale of 1 to 10".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
39. The question is not whether he asks this or not. The interesting thing
will be in how he follows up.

Will he blindly accept any lie she tells as a legitimate answer (my bet is yes)?

Or will he attack and berate her like he did Clinton (no way in hell)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. excellent point, ComerPerro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
41. Done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
42. i sent mine n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insanerepubs Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
43. The Cole Bombing
...took place on October 12th 2000..just sayin':think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. what exactly are you saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insanerepubs Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I am saying
...that the Cole bombing took place on October 12th 2000, 3 months before Bush took office...No accusations just fact...Why are we concentrating on something that happened 6 years ago? Let's work on today and change what's wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. if you will review your history
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 12:48 PM by CatWoman
the perpertrators of that bombing were not confirmed until Bill Clinton was very close to leaving office.

Why would someone about to leave office launch an offensive against the perpertrators?

And why didn't the present administration follow up? Was it not their job to follow up? Was it not their duty to follow up? The Clinton WH let a plan and an investigation into who the culprit was with the current administration.

Yes, it happened 6 years ago, but why is Bill Clinton being blamed for something that happened five years ago? Something that happened several months into the present administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insanerepubs Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. The bombers
were arrested in July 2004 and charged, just sayin'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. The guilty parties were not known until after Bush took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Have you seen the interview
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 12:51 PM by Jim4Wes
Wallace did with Bill Clinton? It might shed some light on this for you:

its in 3 parts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaNIBFSMjb8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT7yKfXN4p0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oinw73s-wdo

You see the RW Republicans know that how people view the past determines how they vote in the present. Thats why they have been trying to re-write history. It is important that we do not stand down and let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insanerepubs Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. I have
seen the interview, several times. Your point is what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. You say you saw the interview
and you read this effort to get Wallace to be more "fair and balanced" and you still think its a waste of time? So you don't think feedback to the newscasters and interviewers is worthwhile...I submit that you haven't been watching how the system works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matthewf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
48. i'll believe it
when i sees it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
50. Done !
she'll just lie like she always does but it will be amazing to watch as usual,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
il_lilac Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
54. done
lets see how they spin this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
volstork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
55. Done, K&R
not that he will pay any attention......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
58. Done. K/R
But if he actually asks her, I'll eat my guitar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC