brettdale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 06:12 PM
Original message |
|
So let me guess this right then.
Iraq had no connection to 9/11.
Iraq had no WMD's.
Iraq had never threaten to nuke the USA.
So Bush*t bombed the crap out of them, and three and a half years later, the USA is still there.
NK said they want WMD's
NK had a street parade with all their WMD's.
NK tested a Nuke weapon.
NK said the USA's actions are a declaration of war.
So what does Bus*h do?
He puts their leader on a diet.
NO SOUP FOR YOU NK!!!!!
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
chicagolefty
(38 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
By ignoring this threat for 6 years. Clinton was the last President to engage the NK's and guess what, it worked. They weren't testing nukes and threatening the world. Bush gets in, calls them evil, isolates them, refuses to talk to them, now they are trying to nuke us.
It's our own damn fault. Bush created that enemy and made the situation 100 times worse with his crazy assed politics.
What's it going to take America, a nuke landing in LA before we kick this nut out of the White House?
|
bling bling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I've been wondering why I haven't heard this yet. |
|
Thank you for voicing the mind-blowing and almost surreal hypocricy.
Is anybody in the media bringing this up? Are any of the Republicans mentioning this? Those are probably stupid questions.
|
oldboy101
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-14-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. How soon will Bush begin carpet bombing North Korea? |
|
Having threatened NK with retaliation if they tested a nuclear bomb, knowing that Kim Jong Il would have to respond to prove he could not be pushed around, Bush got his wish, a nuclear test by NK.
Having coaxed the United Nations into passing a weak resolution condemning NK for this and imposing sanctions, will Bush figure that he has enough justification to begin the bombing now?
With the election only three weeks away and indications that the Democrats will likely take control of Congress, will bombing NK in a new "Shock and Awe" campaign rally the Republican base? There are still a lot of "good old boys" out there who would love this.
What better way to deal with NK's starving population than to bomb them off of the Earth? Could this be Karl's October surprise? I have an uneasy feeling it might just be this scenario. :wtf:
|
chicagolefty
(38 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-15-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-15-06 05:11 PM by chicagolefty
He only attacks nations he thinks he can steamroll over. Iraq was supposed to be a cake walk, he wasn't prepared for a protracted bloody knuckle slug fest that he got.
Now that he's gotten his nose bloodied, he not about to go bombing a nation that has nukes. If he does bomb them, within 24 hours the NK's will bomb the Hell out of the south and kill a good number of the 30k American forces stationed there.
The grunts serving in South Korea know they are nothing more than a speed bump. The NK's would roll right through them. They are to hold their ground until reinforcements can arrive... but guess what? GWB has all of our forces chasing ghosts in Iraq... we don't have the forces to fight another front.
GWB doesn't have the balls to fight a country like NK which he knows can put up a serious fight, not to mention is now NUCLEAR because of his stupid policies.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |