Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jefferson's warning about private banks.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:19 PM
Original message
Jefferson's warning about private banks.
"If the american people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers concurred. The issuing power should be taken from banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lincoln warned about corporations.
There are a lot of things happening in this country that we've been warned about.

Though technically, private banks do not control the issue of currency. They just manipulate everything else that has to do with owning or owing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well ~ who does, in your opinion, control the issue of currency now ?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Last I knew, the Dept of the Treasury still controls
the Issue of Currency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. federal reserve controls currency issue.
it neither federal nor a reserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Correct. Despite it's name, the Federal Reserve is a totally PRIVATE
entity.

With some of the oldest family names as primary stockholders. (the General public cannot buy into this, btw.....one can only marry into it.....if you're *lucky* ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I'm single,
also ready, willing and able to rape and pillage humanity for my own greed, do I make you horny banky?

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. NO
*see how easy that is to say that*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. OK, then can I bake the cake?

And I promise no anthrax this time.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damn commie! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice4Clark Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kennedy tried to change it
In 1963, President John Kennedy wanted an end to the Federal Reserve System, which had a strangle-hold on the United States and virtually the world. By a simple stroke of the pen, President Kennedy dismissed the Federal Reserve System and ordered the U.S. government to restore its Constitutional-mandate of controlling the money. President Kennedy was dead three weeks later. When President Lyndon Johnson took office, he immediately rescinded Kennedy's order and the Federal Reserve won another round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. maybe it was the bankers who had Kennedy killed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. We don't know that.
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 07:28 PM by Selatius
JFK pissed off a lot of interests. He had opponents in the FBI, the CIA, and the mob in addition to the bankers.

Pick your suspect. The fact is all of them had something to gain when JFK was murdered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. yet those other interests were all
paid in federal reserve notes. so regardless of any cia, fbi, or mob interests outside the issue of currency, they all still had one unifying interest, yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. There was Jefferson quote about not trusting the tradesman
because they have no loyalty to country. I know he has several quotes on that subject, but one was so perfect. I wish I could find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. try brainyquotes.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. thanks. The quote was about the tradesman being a bigger
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 08:37 PM by alfredo
threat than external enemies.

this isn't the one, but it is close:

Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains.
Thomas Jefferson

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. The problem with the private banking
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 07:45 PM by slaveplanet
system controlling money supply is this.

Say you ask your father to loan you $100, when he loans it to you there is a debit somewhere, whether he accounts for one or not. It is not a loan, it is a money transfer.

Greatly simplified, When you go to the bank to loan you $100, there is no debit from any depositor's account. It is therefore created. It is debited though. So on the books the bank claims there was $100 created, but that's not the catch, The bank also claims that $15(or whatever) in interest was created , but in reality it isn't, they only created the PRINCIPAL. You never recieved any $15 in addition to your $100.
Therein lay the ponzi scheme, In public life money can only be transferred not created, you can never pay back $115 if only $100 was created...this is how the debt bubble piles up. They can only keep the scheme going for so long until the bubble bursts. Burst it did in 1929 when the bubble was 270% of the GDP. Right now the debt bubble is 300% of the GDP, it is more than we as a collective country can bear. The only thing keeping it afloat is that the rest of the world is enabling it to be afloat. That could change at any time.

Under the DEBT MONEY SYSTEM, when the money supply is expanded by "X", the debt is simultaneously expanded by ("X" plus "Y")...where "Y" is the INTEREST charged on loans. Because ("X" plus "Y") is greater than "X", THE DEBT CAN NEVER BE PAID. This brings us to the Old International Bankers, Trick wherein the Money Supply is expanded greatly in a short period of time. This produces a temporary illusion of prosperity - just like in the "Roaring 20s" when Stocks and Real Estate soared.

Now the trap is set because "X" plus "Y" is greater than "X", so within the money expansion phase there is an inherent DEFLATIONARY TICKING TIME BOMB.

All the International Bankers have to do once the trap is set is to call the loans in, and THE TRAP SPRINGS SHUT.

That,s why the Roaring 20s were followed by the GREAT DEPRESSION. Loans were called in and THE MONEY SUPPLY WAS CONTRACTED VIOLENTLY and STOCKS and REAL ESTATE CRASHED.

We have already had the money expansion phase in DEBT BUBBLE #2.

Crash is inevitable with the present private reserve system, the only question is when and how massive the damage will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. excellent breakdown,
have you seen the only member of congress to address the situation in our lifetime do so?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8327695139643041382&q=9%2F11+press+for+truth&hl=en

sadly it is not one of ours, but then again he really isn't one of theirs either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. No haven't seen it
but let me take a guess...is it DR. Ron Paul?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. yep, on edit:
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 08:17 PM by DiktatrW
not that i agree with his philosophy or anything like that, but he does describe how we got to where we are in a way most can appreciate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Interesting.
Can you explain the alternative or provide a reference so that I can learn more?

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. In a nutshell
Ron Paul breaks it down here:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8327695139643041382&q=9%2F11+press+for+truth&hl=en

Once again not any kind of endosment, but credit where credit is due. (pardon the puns)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thank you.
I found the text too, since I can't really watch video.

http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2006/cr021506.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. video is just him on the house floor
the text will give a decent review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. A recent Robert Hienlien book
talks about this.He gives a chessboard/monopoply money 'game'that lays it all out.
I only wish I could remember the name of the damn book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Samuel Adams' critique was broader and probably harsher
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude
greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us
in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down
and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon
you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. If I am not mistaken,
Sam was talking about the upcoming revolution and the overwhelming majority of american residents who did not support a revolution against the system they were living under. His words transcend to cover this issue as well as those we will most likely face ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. For a minute I thought you were talking about William Jefferson's freezer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. LOL
See what the feds do when you try a little end run on starting your own bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not just the banks, ccc, mega-corporations and lobbyists.
All three (not lobbyists, they always work against the people) have the majorities best interests at heart, but work against the individual as a cornerstone of their business.

Now corporations have the right to take away the land from under our feet if it can prove to a judge they can make a profit over the total value of the lot. Homeless? No you get money for the land, but no one asked you or gave you any choice in the matter.

Money is the root of all evil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. and just as KO pointed out...
we have only the third amendment left intact. Quartering troops in our homes. Well not if bush contends he can produce more tax revenue from Black Water Mercs setting up shop there. But then again after immanent domain takes your land then you really argue that point either now can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. But the Third Ammendment doesn't matter since SCOTUS passed Eminent Domain
They can take away your home whenever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. That was kinda my point
technicaly you are not boarding troops if you no longer own the property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. Oh, duh. Sorry, I must've skipped over your last sentence. lol. =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice4Clark Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. These words ring true today!
"The growth of the nation ... and all our activities are in the hands of a few men ... We have come to be one of the worst ruled; one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world ... no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the free vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."

This was spoken three years after the initiation of the Federal Reserve by the very man who signed the Federal Reserve Act, Woodrow Wilson. A group of bankers funded and staffed his campaign for President and their payback was that he would sign this act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. He also apologized
for what its worth now.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
35. three hours latter
he notices he misspelled conquered, badly, time for another beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. The Money Masters...
Frequently Asked Questions
http://www.themoneymasters.com/faq.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
37. The US is the only country in the world where the national currency supply
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 09:58 PM by gbrooks
is controlled by international financial corporations.

Except for countries that are on the tab to the WMF
which is the same thing as the US Fed when you think
about it.

In terms of monetary policy the US is less well off than
Argentina. At least Argentina can tell the WMF to take
a hike. US citizens have to kiss both the ring and the
ass of the latest Fed chairman.

Presently that means the eminently incompetent Bernanke.
Who is also the chairman of the ironically named Open
Market Fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. All governments lend their money from banks, to be payed back
at interest.
Suppose a government would manage its own currency - then would it lend to itself and pay back at interest to itself? Would not make much sense, would it.
Just the very fact of lending and paying interest implies those banks are not government institutions.
And these large banks coordinate their business with one another; these are international financial corporations and they do control all or virtually all national currency supplies.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atfqn Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
40. The founding fathers also warned against fiat money.
Article 1, Section 10 of the US Constitution says:

"No state shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC