RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 06:44 AM
Original message |
Is CNN saying that 299,999,999 people is good and 300,000,000 is bad |
|
or is 300,000,001 the magic bad number?
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I've seen foreign media cry with sadness over this. |
|
Whatever. You can't get anywhere by wishing America away or something like that.
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Aren't those general laments about overpopulation in general, using the "magic number" in the US as an opportunity to bring the issue?
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
16. Hm. Crickets. Tumbleweeds. |
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. I'm sorry, I don't have an easy link for you. |
|
It was front page on the web site of one of the big British papers (either the Guardian or the Independent, I read both online when I can) a few days ago but I no longer see any sign of the stories in either. I was trying to comment, not thread hijack. Sorry.
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 07:04 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Too many brown people! We're WAY overcrowded! |
|
Except for all that empty area between the coasts....
That's it! Send the brown people there!
}(
|
calico1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 07:07 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Well, Hispanics and Asians account for the |
|
largest growth according to Today. Maybe that's why it's "bad."
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 07:18 AM
Response to Original message |
5. because 300,000,001 and 2 will turn out liberal. |
wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 07:25 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Population growth is a real problem |
|
We should have serious conversation on this topic.
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I agree. But, I doubt that you'll find many takers. |
|
It seems to be one of many subjects not nearly as exciting as the sex-lives of politicians and teachers wearing veils.
|
focusfan
(884 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Farmers and ranchers understand over grazing quite well
|
earthside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
The population of human beings on the planet Earth is now over 6,500,000,000.
The biggest consumer of natural resources on the planet is the U.S. -- and our human population is now 300,000,000+.
The reason why global warming is so bad and so dangerous is because there are too many human beings all aspiring to become consumers of energy and material items like Americans.
But here in the U.S., especially because of the illegal immigration debate, liberals and progressives and environmentalist are not supposed to talk about "overpopulation".
This is why there is very little reason to be optimistic about our future -- dealing with global warming and dwindling resources is directly related to "overpopulation" and is a huge political problem. But we're not supposed to talk about this because somehow it makes us intolerant or bigoted.
This is indeed a sad day for the U.S.; it means that we are failing to seriously address the critical environmental and social problems facing us. Three hundred million people living here, all wanting cars and processed food and computers and lots of electricity to run the dishwasher and dryer and DVD player means that our carbon footprint as a nation is increasing hugely. That means the whole Earth suffers from more greenhouse gases infiltrating the atmosphere.
But, let's not talk about this, because it makes us too uncomfortable.
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Google search turned up that the U.S. pop. would be approx. 571 million by the year 2100. :yoiks:
|
wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I can't see how that would be a good thing |
|
Oil is in decline, natural gas will peak in North America and the associated costs of agriculture and transportation will only increase as further demands are put on them.
I look to Europe and Japan and see that they at least consider sustainability. Amerika is so consumed with its own myopia and capitalistic inertia that there is no way to prevent the coming train wreck. It seems addressing a daunting problem now would be far preferable to addressing an impossible problem later.
:dem: GORE 2008
|
tabasco
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. Human population has been too high on this planet for a long time. |
|
I decided to start donating to organizations that promote birth control and ZPG.
Overpopulation is the #1 problem. Many other problems are simply symptoms: war, famine, plagues, destruction of natural habitat.
IMO, plain old greed is the #2 prolem.
|
Frustratedlady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Their 300,000,000 probably didn't include the illegal aliens.
|
lectrobyte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I think the estimates include that number. There are more than |
|
12 million nationwide from what I hear, anyway, probably more like at least double that.
|
focusfan
(884 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-17-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Population explosion in the 60`s |
|
is what they said back then with less than 200 million,and was encouraging birth control.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |