Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter by Dem's Wall Street Why Democrats Oppose Military Commission Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:43 AM
Original message
Letter by Dem's Wall Street Why Democrats Oppose Military Commission Act
Not a bad letter in the Wall Street Journal

Your assertion "Democrats on Al Qa eda," Review & outlook. Oct.2) that Democrats will not be tough on terrorism because many of us opposed the Republican's Military Commission Act is offensive and untrue. The party of Wilson,Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy and Clinton takes a back seat to no one in protecting our nation and our people.We have always fought for freedom and confronted tyranny-- and do so today.

Our national security interests are best served when we interrogate and try terrorist suspects in a manner that comports with our American values; produces convictions that will withstand appeals; and honors our international commitments, thereby protecting our troops who fall into enemy hands. We believe the Republican bill failed on each point.

If anything, the Military Commission Act is not tough enough on terrorist because there is no certainty the act will withstand the scrutiny of the Supreme Court. If the act is tied up in litigation and eventually struck down, convicted terrorist could have a "get-out-of-jail-free" card. During the debate on legislation, we pointed to numerous constitutional challenges that will likely be brought against the act, such as that it unlawfully strips federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas corpus claims; creates ex post facto laws in violation of Article 1; purports to make the president the final arbiter of the Geneva Conventions ,in violation of Article 3; and because of the way it is written, may apply to U.S. citizens -as well as non-citizens - and allow coerced testimony in violation of the 5th, 8th and 14th Amendments.

Steny H Hoyer (D-MD)
House Democratic Whip

Ike Skelton (D-M)
Ranking Democrat
House Armed Service Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good letter, except the Congressmen need to work on their plurals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. MY HUSBAND AND I HELPED IKE GET ELECTED MANY YEARS AGO
a wonderful wonderful man!!

My husband used to hunt with his brother!! in the Lexington Area of Missouri!

Ike is a truely wonderful man!! ( and damn honest!!)

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I've always wondered...
...is he any relation to Red Skelton? He looks an awful lot like him.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. no...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Damn Good Letter!
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 11:53 AM by annabanana
This insupportable Military Commission Act has to be brought up again and again and again until the American people can see it for what it is.

(edit: nominated)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC