Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many here don't know that filibusters are NOT one-man shows anymore?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:40 PM
Original message
How many here don't know that filibusters are NOT one-man shows anymore?
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 07:43 PM by blm
That the rules were changed over 30 years ago?

That it takes 41 senators voting AGAINST cloture to begin a filibuster?

That senators can make it known that they WOULD filibuster, but there is no filibuster until there are 41 KNOWN votes against cloture?

Cuz some of you sound as badly informed as Free Republic today, and refuse to read the posts correcting the disinfo you're spreading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee... so many threads by people who obviously don't know how filibuster
works, yet they won't admit it here. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not Mr. Smith Goes to Washington anymore
Thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for keeping a clear head.
I know I always appreciate it when people get me facts when my statements are wrong. Some folks just get agitated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hell, I've been wrong so many times....
I should run for President!
Except I don't think I could lie half as well as Scumbag Boy (the blushing tends to give me away).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. not quite right. the rules were changed then but only on how many it took
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 08:05 PM by bullimiami
for cloture to pass. formerly 2/3 changed to 3/5.
one man can fillibuster as long as he has 40 more in his corner to vote against cloture.

it is still mr smith. the rules that created cloture were adopted in 1917.

a cloture vote doesnt begin the fillibuster but the passage ends it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. heh... at that point it's semantics, but I appreciate the input.
I was really trying to keep it simple. VERY simple. ;))))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. They send the number up
And notify that there's 41 to filibuster. At least that's the preferred way to do it, not sure if it's a hard fast rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. You're right AND wrong
A one man show filibuster can still happen, though they aren't very effective.

The filibuster talked about over Alito, however, would be a failure to vote in favor of cloture, thus the debate must continue. When a cloture vote fails, generally, the Senate moves on to other business while allowing the matter being debated to sit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They'd move to end debate
So without the 41 votes, there really couldn't be a filibuster in that case, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. IF 40 or fewer Senators vote against cloture
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 08:25 PM by Walt Starr
debate ends and a vote on the matter is taken. Otherwise, debate continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah
So it takes 41 to filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC