Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid Hitpieces- Fed To Solomon Via Barbara Comstock (DOJ Hack)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:04 PM
Original message
Reid Hitpieces- Fed To Solomon Via Barbara Comstock (DOJ Hack)
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 06:35 PM by cryingshame
Talking Points Memo has some great info on Solomon being a sponge for opposition research from BOTH sides. Someone reports that the Reid hit pieces are most likely coming from Barbara Comstock.

I've never pimped my own thread before but PLEASE consider kicking this and recommending.

October 17, 2006 -- 11:39 AM EST // link)
TPM Reader AM asks ...

Does someone at the AP have it out for Harry Reid? Seems like they are pushing minor rule misinterpretations up to full scandal type stories. Is there a central figure behind this?
In a word, yes.

AP reporter John Solomon. We reported on this fairly extensively when Solomon first got cranking on this in June.

I know a number of people who know or have worked for Solomon. And I've never gotten the impression that Solomon has any political or ideological ax to grind. His rep is as an easy mark for oppo researchers peddling their wares -- and from both sides.

Here's what one former colleague of Solomon's said last week: "I worked years in the same office as Solomon, sometimes with him. The consensus: he's lazy, and takes hit jobs handed him on a platter by opps research teams (and anyone will do.) And doesn't do much to clean it up. I also know one of his fave and frequent sources is Barbara Comstock, former DOJ spxwoman and GOP attack dog."

I've heard the same from numerous oppo researchers and journalists. (Here are some thoughts on legitimate and illegitimate ways journalists use material from oppo researchers.)

If you're interested in finding out more about this, you might also look at this 2004 article in The Atlantic Monthly about how oppo researchers get their goods into articles. Look at the articles referenced and then go back and see the bylines.

On Reid, I think it's a combination of two things. One, as I said, he's an easy mark for oppo researchers peddling stuff that other journos didn't think met the laugh test. And two, he hasn't really landed a punch yet and Reid's fought back. So now it's a bit personal.

-- Josh Marshall
www.talkingpointsmemo.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Let's hope that it won't have much effect on the election. I understand that there is nothing the land deal although I heard there were more and the other thing was just a stupid thing to do.
Anyway, it would be stupid if something like this would turn the political climate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Joe Conason mentions Comstock in a piece about Scooter Libby
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 06:16 PM by cryingshame
Actually, someone who personifies all those categories and more has materialized to mastermind the Scooter Libby defense committee, with promises of financial assistance and supportive publicity.

Her name is Barbara Comstock, a minor figure from the Whitewater era, when she served as "chief investigator" for Rep. Dan Burton, the wigged-out Indiana congressman who once executed a watermelon to demonstrate his sinister theory concerning the fate of Vince Foster, the White House counsel who committed suicide in 1993. During those glory years, she joined David Brock and the rest of the Republican pack in the hunting of Bill and Hillary Clinton. In his memoir, "Blinded by the Right," Brock described Comstock as almost unhinged in her passion to bring down the Clintons.

Comstock calmed down enough to serve as director of public affairs in John Ashcroft's Justice Department, to run opposition research for the Republican National Committee and, ultimately, after leaving government, to join the powerhouse lobbying firm of Blank Rome, best known for its huge contributions to the Republican Party, its close association with former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge and other Bush appointees, and its lucky clientele of DHS contractors.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2005/11/15/libby_defense/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. there are a bunch of media matters pieces on him, and a page
at sourcewatch, I think

I linked them in an earlier thread

thanks for this

now it's on the GP

Comstock is one of the very very worst

she was in charge of the Boiler Room smear campaign against Gore, and was in Ashcroft's PR dept when he was Atty Gen





from 2000:

''Last week the UK TV network premiered "Digging The Dirt" - an astonishing documentary which exposes the rough and tumble tactics of both the Bush and Gore campaigns. The program is a special in the network's flagship weekly news show "Panorama" - which has the stature in Britain of "60 Minutes." Of course the special aired just in Britain - where it could do no harm to either campaign.

In a way it is a PRE-mortem on the election.

The film delves into many aspects of this year's battles. We see inside closeups of how Bush decimated McCain by brutal push-poll phone calls; how Gore traduced Bradley by savage attacks on his health care proposals; how the New York Post went hell-for-leather in trumpeting a dubious anti-Semitic charge against Hillary Clinton.

But the overwhelming coup of the film is the insight it brings to the Republican version of Carville's War Room - the seething boiler room at RNC headquarters in D.C. where GOP Head of Research Barbara Comstock and Deputy-Head Tim Griffin ply a rough trade that has probably cost Gore the election.''

http://www.martinlewis.com/column.pl?col=33&cat=time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's already working.
No matter how minor or even laughable the charges against Reid, all the commentators and correspondents on CNN tonight were harping on the "culture of corruption" involving both parties. It allows them to paint Dems with the same broad corruption brush, even though what Reid is accused of is ridiculously minor -- nothing on the level of starting a war on a lie, killing 650,000 innocent civilians, breeding an entire network of criminals a la Abramoff, being a serial House page molester/stalker, and on and on.

Instead, Reid's so-called "crime" is something that is significantly blurry to make average dumb/incurious Joe Sixpack say, "They're all crooked!"

Just what the GOP needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Comstock-One Woman Wrecking Crew Targeting Democratic Leaders
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 06:24 PM by cryingshame
Meticulous Comstock Helps RNC Skewer the Opposition

By John Mintz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 22, 2001; Page A17

Barbara Comstock, a daughter of Massachusetts Democrats and the only kid in her eighth-grade class for George McGovern in 1972, recalls her moment of political revelation:

She was a college intern in Washington for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), and her roommate handed her a copy of a magazine she had never heard of -- National Review. Soon, she said, "I'd be at hearings and think, 'I agree with Orrin Hatch , not Ted Kennedy.' "

Democrats everywhere should bewail that that conservative magazine ever changed hands.

Since joining the GOP, Comstock has become a kind of one-woman wrecking crew targeting Democratic leaders. As a onetime senior aide to Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) who directed numerous investigations of Clinton-era scandals, and now as head of research for the Republican National Committee, Comstock has perhaps done more than any other GOP operative to skewer Bill Clinton, Al Gore and their congressional allies.

Comstock is a practitioner of the mysterious Washington art of "opposition research" -- mining public documents for embarrassing facts about political adversaries and releasing them for maximum punch. "Rush Limbaugh should pay her as a news source for all her stuff he uses," an RNC colleague said.

Republicans rave about her effectiveness, but what is striking is that in this time of bitter political partisanship, even some Democrats privately acknowledge the even-keeled Comstock does her work with care.

Asked for a comment about her, a spokesman for the Democratic National Committee called back with a statement from John Podesta, White House counsel under former president Clinton. He recalled his depositions at the hands of Comstock and Barbara Olson, her more overtly partisan partner during their years as congressional GOP investigators.

"In the world of the Barbaras," Podesta said, "you'd have to say Barbara Comstock is the good twin."

Gary Maloney, himself a GOP opposition researcher, said Clinton's presidential campaigns swamped Republican opponents in 1992 and 1996 with sharper research and swifter dissemination. But the GOP's research operation roared back under Comstock in the last two years, he said.

"She's meticulous and thorough . . . research was one of the most successful parts of the RNC in 2000," Maloney said. "She's built respect among reporters for not being exceedingly partisan, she avoids ideological boilerplate and she's not a hater."

In any case, politicking came late to her. She proudly points out that after law school, she stayed home raising three children -- "the hardest job I ever had," she said.

In 1990, she volunteered in the office of Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.) and later worked for him full time, on youth issues. In 1993, Wolf asked her to look into allegations that the Clintons had improperly arranged the firing of White House travel office employees, who were Wolf constituents.

Soon she was pursuing that case for the House Government Reform Committee, run by Rep. William Clinger (R-Pa.). Alone in the office one late night in 1993, she was scrutinizing boxes of newly released papers on the matter when she spotted a line in a White House official's memo -- "there would be hell to pay" with first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, it said, if the travel office employees were not dismissed.

She immediately called her colleague Olson to return to the office. "We were up all night," Comstock said. Hillary Clinton, now a New York senator, has maintained she played no role in the firings, but last year independent counsel Robert W. Ray said her sworn testimony to that effect was false.

Soon Comstock was working on the panel for a more confrontational and controversial boss, Burton, for whom she led investigations into the Democratic fundraising scandals of 1996.

In 1999, she was recruited to revamp the RNC's research office. Soon she had a staff of 30, including experts in such fields as health care and foreign policy. Most were more experienced and a decade older than their Democratic research counterparts.

She was the one who publicized former vice president Gore's testimony that he hadn't been present for a key discussion of a questionable fundraising gambit because he "drank a lot of iced tea" and was in the bathroom. In that case and others, she said, "when something you put out ends up on Jay Leno, you say, 'Yay.' "

Drawing on a massive RNC computer data base and video library she built, Comstock compiled a foot-high binder and CD-ROM called "The Gore File," which became a bible of sorts for GOP publicists and ad-makers. When Democratic presidential contender Bill Bradley alleged in primary season debates that Gore had flip-flopped on abortion, he was relying on this Comstock lode, political sources said.

Her team also helped prepare George W. Bush for the presidential debates by amassing files on Gore's debating techniques. GOP officials credit her with discovering some of the alleged cases of Gore overstatement during the Bush-Gore debates that upended the vice president late in the campaign.

"We quote, we source, we document," Comstock said, "because we know we'll be attacked."

After the election, her team spent a month pulling virtual all-nighters at a West Palm Beach hotel assisting GOP operatives in the Florida vote recount. They then wrote the GOP playbook defending Bush nominees such as John D. Ashcroft, for attorney general.

Comstock's authority at RNC is widening fast, and she now heads not only its research but also its strategic planning. She is helping run an expensive new RNC initiative to address a problem that has deepened for her party since 1980 -- the fact that most women vote Democratic.

"Republicans have an opportunity with women because of the issues President Bush is working on, like education," she said. "I want my daughter to know, when he's talking about troop movements in Iraq, he's talking to Condoleezza Rice."

The women's initiative could be one reason Comstock, usually guarded about discussing her investigations, agreed to be interviewed for this article, GOP sources said. Her personal story -- returning to work after years as a homemaker, and then rising to the top of her trade -- as well as her gentle exterior, dovetail with the party's appeals to women, the GOP sources said.

"I care about these issues for my kids, and my parents," she said. "I'm doing something that connects to my whole life."

But one Democratic woman is unswayed -- her grandmother. After Comstock appears on television dispensing the GOP line, the older woman will call, she said, "and Grandma will say, 'I listened with the sound down. I liked your suit.'
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A43033-2001Aug21

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Link? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. last week there was a piece over at tpmmuckraker that went over this...
I posted about how they debunked Solomon's allegation from last week:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2878777

AP's Reid Story Doesn't Add Up
By Paul Kiel - October 11, 2006, 11:10 PM

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) "collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years," the AP reports.

Except that's wrong. Reid made a $700,000 profit on the sale, not $1.1 million. Also, the story, by the AP’s John Solomon, makes it sound as if Reid got money for land he didn't own. But that's not the case.

It’s not the first time that Solomon has published a misleading story about Reid. This is the third such story by Solomon over the past six months. Each time, Solomon has hit Reid for taking actions which might create the appearance of ethical impropriety. But because Solomon writes for the most powerful news organization in the land, these very gray-shaded stories pack a wallop. It doesn’t help that on numerous occasions, he has missed or distorted key details – missteps that help blow up his stories.

more...
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001782.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Would that make him a mockingbird or just a stooge? K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC