So what happened with that Larry Craig outing?

[chaska]

Anybody got a link? Or maybe some kind soul will cut to the chase and just gimme the skinny, di-rectly.

[AlCzervik]

1. he was outed, he denied it and thats about it.

no traction.

[David Dunham]

2. He denied it and there is no publicly revealed proof to show it.

[onenote]

4. link to denial?

Has Craig even acknowledged the allegation? I'd be surprised if he had.

[maddezmom]

8. denied the charge

http://www.newwest.net/index.php/city/article/idaho_sen_larry_craig_denies_allegations_of_same_sex_affairs/C108/L108/

[onenote]

9. Thanks!

I hadn't seen that.

[onenote]

3. nothing really

Rogers named Craig, said he had spoken to men who had physical relations with Craig, didn't identify those men, produce a statement by any of them, or otherwise substantiate the claim and, thus, predictably, the "story" was ignored.

[spinbaby]

5. I thought there was video

Sex in Union Station, as I recall. Just vapor?

[onenote]

6. rogers website says nothing about a video

[AlCzervik]

7. there was something like that from blogactive.

[DURHAM D]

10. These things take time.

The regional papers are carrying it. Craig has denied it - which really surprised me. I thought he would ignore it in order to take the juice out of it.

He is not up for re-election so it is not an emergency. More than likely, he won't run again. Only people that live and vote in Idaho would have an idea of how much it matters.

[CabalPowered]

11. If we can get someone to source the Page story then it might grow legs

I hadn't heard the Page story but standing around the water cooler yesterday, it seemed I was the only one that didn't know about the Page incident. :shrug:

edit: sp

[sandnsea]

12. With no evidence, it was just a dumb stunt

If that's all anybody has, it isn't even worth it to do this. It even defuses the Foley scandal because now people can say it's all political. We have some real dumb bunnies on our side.