Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court denies plea to shut down Spamhaus (Anti-Spam Site)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:56 AM
Original message
Court denies plea to shut down Spamhaus (Anti-Spam Site)
Court denies plea to shut down Spamhaus
By: Jeremy Kirk
IDG News Service (London Bureau) (20 Oct 2006)

A U.S. judge has denied an appeal that would have suspended the domain name for The Spamhaus Project Ltd., averting a potential quagmire over how U.S. legal rulings apply across the global Internet.

Spamhaus, a group of computer security experts based in London, creates a database used by security vendors to block unsolicited bulk e-mail, known as spam.

Last month, an e-mail marketing company, e360 Insight LLC, won an $11.7 million judgement against Spamhaus in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois. The ruling also called for Spamhaus to remove e360 from its blacklists.

Spamhaus, which has been sued in the U.S. several times, typically ignores the rulings. It says U.S. courts do not have jurisdiction over it since the group is based in the U.K. Spamhaus maintains that e360's e-mail constitutes spam and violates U.K. law.

The U.S. lawsuits against Spamhaus typically end there, but earlier this month e360 raised the stakes. On Oct. 6 it asked the U.S. court to force the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and Spamhaus's domain registrar, Tucows Inc., to suspend its domain name.

The request sparked speculation that ICANN, which is subject to U.S. law, would be required to enforce that law internationally by, for example, shutting down a foreign Web site. ICANN said later that even if a court did order it to shut down a domain, it couldn't do that since that power lies with individual registrars.

More:
http://www.itworldcanada.com/a/News/0df7e3b5-3acd-4d77-b34a-1a15b4f68cbb.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting! Bookmarking. This is something to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. If they win the case to close Spamhaus, it'll just go underground
Edited on Fri Oct-20-06 10:59 AM by htuttle
I use Spamhaus' blackhole list at work to help keep our mail server cleaner. There are several other lesser known blackhole servers, and if they go down, other ones will come back up.

This is war.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC