she quit, and how much she's getting paid at her new gig?
From
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-lewis18oct18,1,12986.story?coll=la-news-a_section :
"Legal Fees Are Drain on Lewis' War Chest
The congressman from Redlands has paid lawyers $750,000 amid a federal lobbying probe.
By Richard Simon, Times Staff Writer
October 18, 2006
WASHINGTON Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-Redlands), the House Appropriations Committee chairman whose ties to lobbyists have come under scrutiny, has spent more than $750,000 from his campaign fund for defense lawyers, according to his latest spending report. Federal investigators are examining Lewis' association with lobbyists who have secured millions of dollars in congressional earmarks for their clients. Lobbyists and their clients have contributed heavily to Lewis' political war chests, records show. ... More than $550,000 was paid to the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher between July 1 and Sept. 30. And he paid the firm a $200,000 retainer in June. ...
His lead lawyers are Robert Bonner, who once headed the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles as well as U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and Joseph Warin, a onetime federal prosecutor. IN A TWIST, U.S. ATTY. DEBRA WONG YANG OF LOS ANGELES, WHOSE OFFICE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATING LEWIS, ANNOUNCED TUESDAY THAT SHE WAS RESIGNING HER FEDERAL JOB TO JOIN GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER. She could not be reached for comment, but a spokeswoman for the law firm said Yang would have "no involvement whatsoever" with Lewis.
Even with the legal fees, Lewis whose challenger is so little-known and -funded that the congressman hasn't hired a campaign manager or opened a campaign office entered the home stretch of the campaign with more than $1 million cash on hand, according to his report. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group that posted Lewis' legal fees on its website, said some of the congressman's donors "work at some of the most prolific lobby shops specializing in federal earmarks."
Earmarking is the largely secret process that committee chairs and other powerful members of the House and Senate use to insert spending directives into pending legislation without going through the normal budget review process. The use of earmarks has soared in recent years...."