flamin lib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 02:45 PM
Original message |
|
That President Hillary Clinton's (or whoever) first act in office is to declare the entire RNC enemy combatants and hold them without charges and legal council.
Hey, it could happen . . .
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
1. waterboarding for them all |
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This guy has the right idea |
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I know folks here are mostly joking about this |
|
however, I've reached a point where I REALLY want this to happen. Even though it would be the sum of all fears regarding the unitary executive that this congress has created. But I would really like to see about 10,000 to 100,000 traitors removed from doing more harm, possibly simply exiled but certainly charged under the laws that they promoted.
Just venting.
|
flamin lib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Not kidding, serious as a heart attack. |
|
Lock up the entire RNC until the law is repealed. It's from the "be careful what you ask for" file.
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Hmmmm. Than exactly how are we better than the Republicans? |
flamin lib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Please note the Repeal of the law as the goal of the exercise. |
|
It is one way of getting 100% support from the opposition party and forcing the admission that it's a bad idea.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I'd rather sweep and impeach in '06 |
|
and let whatever happens in 08 just top things off.
|
AnneD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-20-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
8. The GOP have a history of passing changes |
|
only to come back and bite them in the butt. After FDR, they pushed until they got a 2 term limit on the office of the President. Now, all you older DUrs, name 2 presidents that could have won a third term after FDR....Eisenhower and Reagan. The Dem's had only on candidate...Clinton. From my mouth to God's ear, I home these laws come back to bite them hard on the ass.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message |