Hey, let's buy Tony Snow a copy of Carl von Clausewitz's classic, ON WAR, and help him understand the difference between "strategy" and "tactics". Tony's tap dancing today during the White House press briefing revealed a shallow political hack swimming in deep waters. When asked, "are we winning", poor Tony could not come up with a definition of victory. In fact, he responded rhetorically, "what is victory". According to Clausewitz:
tactics teaches the use of armed forces in the engagement; strategy, the use of engagements for the object of the war
What is our objective in Iraq? Eliminating weapons of mass destruction? Promoting democracy? "Fighting them (the terrorists) there so we don't have to fight them here?" These are not mutually compatible objectives. It is the lack of a clear answer that accounts for our nation's inability to define victory in Iraq. Bush, Cheney, and Rummy need to figure out what in the hell we are trying to do. Once that is clearly defined then we will be in a position to devise tactics that will complement the strategic objective.
All of this comes against the backdrop of the latest sign that the U.S. backed government is feckless and feeble.
(snip)
At this point, the U.S. objectives should be to re-establish our image as "liberators (rather than occupiers) and avoid inflicting anymore pain, death, and humiliation on the Iraqi people. If we continue to be perceived as the agent of death in Iraq, we are sowing seeds for a generation of terrorism and revenge that will haunt our grandchildren. That is a strategy that will guarantee defeat.
more
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/oct/20/on_the_road_to_strategic_defeat_in_iraq