Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Few Questions about NSA Spying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:46 AM
Original message
A Few Questions about NSA Spying
Dubya and Co. tell us that they're only tapping the calls of people in America that are speaking to members of Al Qaeda. Here's what I want to know:

1) How does the administration know people are chatting with Al Qaeda on the phone?

2) Is the administration bugging Al Qaeda member's phones?

3) If they're bugging Al Qaeda, then doesn't that mean the administration knows where Al Qaeda members are physically located?

4) If the administration knows where Al Qaeda members are physically located, why don't they go get them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Actually the echelon system is designed to look for keywords during
conversations. Maybe of a particular language.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes but
I thought the nsa thing had to do with tapping phone lines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ok...
Echelon listens for words in phone convos. However, that doesn't explain how the administration can claim these Americans are talking to Al Qaeda members specifically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Realistically, they can't.
They can listen to specific numbers, which they claim come from reliable intelligence (no doubt the same reliable intelligence that gave us reports of terrorists with biotoxins disguised as perfume), but they can't have any real assurance that these numbers are actually connected to terrorists. These numbers allegedly come from cell phones and laptops found in Afghanistan and elsewhere, but knowing how honest these people are, I'd tend to doubt it.

The much more probable method, and what it's been reported that they use, is computerized scanning of ALL calls going in or out of the US, which is a much broader thing. They tap into the big telecommunication trunks and check everything moving over the border, probably recording anything which triggered a hit on a variety of words or word combinations. For instance, if you happened to call somebody in London, and you used words which--while innocuous to you--the NSA views as potential codewords, then your conversation might be recorded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hey, I know they're blowing smoke up our asses
However, this is what president crackbaby said at K-State this week:

"This is a -- I repeat to you, even though you hear words, "domestic spying," these are not phone calls within the United States. It's a phone call of an al Qaeda, known al Qaeda suspect, making a phone call into the United States."

My belief is they use this as the stock explanation because if they had to explain the process in detail, they would reveal their crime. If we blow holes in their simplistic explanation with questions similar to the ones in my original questions, we might tip their hand...:think:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Echelon is used to tap phone lines as well as every other form
of electronic communication. It is like a huge filter. It is not a violation to tap into and provide the data for further research to hunt down terrorists, but it is a crime to spy on fellow Americans just because they do not agree with the current government's policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Actually, it may be a violation depending on who's targeted.
Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveilance Act, it's illegal to spy on a "U.S. person" without a warrant. A "U.S. person" is defined as a citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident. So if a US citizen's phone calls were intercepted without a warrant, it would still be illegal even if that person were having lunch with Osama Bin Laden. Of course, you'd have two weeks in which to go to the secret FISA court and obtain a warrant *after* you intercepted the conversation, assuming that you had probable cause. Getting the warrant would make it legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. anybody can listen to a radio signal
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 03:34 AM by rfkrfk
if you don't want everyone in the universe listening,
don't use a public carrier, or use PGP

if the NSA is prohibited from listening,
your privacy will be vastly IMPROVED -->

instead of 180 countries listening,
it will be only 179 countries listening

edited for spelliing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. They must be using the wrong key words because all they
seem to turn up are Bush critics -- Quakers, vegans, peace grannies.

Either the Cabal is the stupidest bunch of people ever born or, we are for believing anything that comes out of their mouths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. BOMB ANTHRAX TERROR USAMA AL QAEDA JEFF GANNON
They should be here any minute.
If they're all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I emailed a large audio file to a buddy in Amsterdam. It was
Doug's cd and one of the sets is political.

Lol! We're on the list. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. I would add a number 5.
If he has the unbridled right to select whoever he chooses to listen to and no one could possibly know, does anybody with a stem cell in their brain think he's listening only to al Quida ? Pu-lease.

He's probably layed on his bed with his feet up and listened to Patrick Fitzgerald already. I would bet anything on it. THAT'S what the stupid half of America still has to get their head around. People who can't grasp this don't even have the IQ to qualify as mental patients if they can't understand that.

If nobody knows, how's anybody going to know? It's the plan made in heaven. Makes me just want to grab people and shake em.

Nixon didn't break into his OWN headquarters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC