Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial: New Bush space policy "jingoistic," "belligerent"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:07 AM
Original message
NYT editorial: New Bush space policy "jingoistic," "belligerent"
Editorial
Flexing Our Muscles in Space
Published: October 21, 2006

The Bush administration has adopted a jingoistic and downright belligerent tone toward space operations. In a new “national space policy” posted without fanfare on an obscure government Web site, and in recent speeches, it has signaled its determination to be pre-eminent in space — as it is in air power and sea power — while opposing any treaties that might curtail any American action there.

This chest-thumping is being portrayed as a modest extension of the Clinton administration’s space policy issued a decade ago. And so far there is no mention of putting American weapons in space. But the more aggressive tone of the Bush policy may undercut international cooperation on civilian space projects — a goal to which the new policy subscribes — or set off an eventual arms race in space.

The new policy reflects the worst tendencies of the Bush administration — a unilateral drive for supremacy and a rejection of treaties. And it comes just as the White House is desperately seeking help to rein in the nuclear programs of North Korea and Iran. That effort depends heavily on cooperation from China and Russia, two countries with their own active space programs.

The administration regards the policy as a necessary update to reflect how important space is becoming for the American economy and defense. But outside experts who have parsed the language are struck by how forceful and nationalistic it sounds.

Whereas the 1996 policy opened with assurances that the United States would pursue greater levels of partnership and cooperation in space, the new policy states: “In this new century, those who effectively utilize space will enjoy added prosperity and security and will hold a substantial advantage over those who do not. Freedom of action in space is as important to the United States as air power and sea power.”...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/21/opinion/21sat1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Jingoism"
Edited on Sat Oct-21-06 02:11 AM by TechBear_Seattle
Jingoism is a word you don't see much nowadays, although it is practiced all to often by the Junta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, well, there may be terra-ists on Mars.
Not to worry, though. Bush's entire "science" team thinks the Earth is 6,000 years old and the sky is made of papier-mache. They don't believe in space travel because it's not in the Bible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. The thing that first came to my mind
aside from the embarrassing faux macho strutting by *, is that if his administration's policies encourage further radical Xtian opposition to science, and keep on pushing such idiotic fantasies such as "Intelligent Design", and continue to ignore the science explaining global warming, we will never be competitive in the space race.

The same new century he talks about is a century which will depend on students learning actual science, instead of myth. He can't have both religious right narrow mindedness, and cutting edge technology. The two things do not go together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. "A unilateral drive for supremacy and a rejection of treaties"
Those are not his "worst tendencies". They are his freakin' trademarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. "jingoistic," "belligerent"...everything comes back to J.B. w/ this guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Darth W Vader - as George Lucas called him on the Colbert report
Edited on Sat Oct-21-06 09:36 AM by The Count
when he submitted his own Star Wars themed 'amateur film" homage to Colbert (in the end, they both (George&Stephen) dueled with light sabers - in the studio that is. Great moment in geekdom history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneyedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. "jingoistic" & "belligerent" - sums up the last 6 years. + "corrupt" too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Jingoism, belligerence, and corruption served up daily via mendacity,
duplicity and disingenuousness by a cadre of reichous and sanctimonious lying minions and media whores. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC