Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Armstrong Williams has to pay $34K for not pushing enough propaganda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 01:55 PM
Original message
Armstrong Williams has to pay $34K for not pushing enough propaganda
Conservative pundit Armstrong Williams, whose 2003 deal to promote President Bush's education reforms on TV, radio and in newspapers spawned a government-wide crackdown on propaganda, will pay $34,000 for not delivering all that his contract required, according to documents signed Friday.

The settlement puts to rest a civil investigation that stretched more than a year and a half and could have cost Williams $64,000 — but which did not address whether he wrongly promoted the Bush administration's education agenda. Instead, the Justice Department investigation examined whether he was paid for public service ads he didn't produce.

Under the settlement, Williams admits no wrongdoing. He did not face criminal charges in the case, says Channing Phillips, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office within the Justice Department.

"The (Education) Department is pleased to see this matter come to a close," Katherine McLane, spokesperson for Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said Friday. "As one of her first actions at the Department, Secretary Spellings took aggressive action to correct the situation and create clear guidelines to prevent future occurrences."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-10-20-williams_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, whatever happened to that other lawsuit, where that guy sued him for
sexual harassment? There was this one, http://home.earthlink.net/~zkkatz/page88.html but I thought another one had cropped up, as well...?

It's getting hard to keep all these GOP scandals straight!!! No puns intended...!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cue the theme music from the "Twilight Zone"
The Justice Department investigated why Mr. Williams did not complete the contract after the contract was suspended. I think I need Rod Sterlings' attorney to explain this one to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why should he be paid for work he didn't do?
Nevermind he couldn't do it. He didn't do it. So why should he just keep the money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. First and foremost, this was an illegal contract to begin with!
There are lawyers who look at these things before they signed and dated, if not on Armstrong side the government would definitely have a lawyer or two review the contract. If Armstrong had a lawyer review the contract and that lawyer said the contract looks good to me, Armstrong needs to fire that lawyer. If Armstrong did this without consulting a lawyer, then Armstrong is an idiot and to boot, he cannot plead ignorance because the law does not recognize that excuse!

On the government side, there needs to be a review of the contract process in this case. It was an illegal contract hands down, and the government cannot willingly present propaganda to the citizens of the U.S.A. This review has not been done.

What is going on here is "Whitewash 101". The Justice Department says we went to court and Armstrong returned the money, case closed. This is a criminal case and people need to go to jail and pay fines, both Armstrong and any government officials who participated in this contract. Having a court case and some money returned to the source of the contract does not right this wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I see your point. Far be it from me to argue this ends with repayment
Unfortunately it's a little hard to make the Justice Department enforce the laws it doesn't want to enforce...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. SOP for the White House. Vote in November!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. This whole situation with paying journalists to spread propaganda
makes my hair hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bad shill! BAD!! *slap* nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. The whole deal is illegal, but they only fine him for NOT doin part of it?
Frickin' INSANE.
Just unbelievably, blatantly, in-yer-face CORRUPT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, that's just priceless!
A strong K+R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC