Tim4319
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:07 AM
Original message |
Now for about the 100th time Howard Dean has told the media |
|
"No Democrats" accepted any of Jack Abramoff's money. Can someone in the media please do some real investigation into this scandal? Or, is that too much like right!?
|
Christa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It's one of those fables |
|
like Saddam and 9/11 - if they repeat it often enough, the people will believe it.
|
King Coal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Or even if Jack Abramoff directed any payments from his clients to dems. |
PATRICK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Way past time to counter with |
|
Here's the networks that have accepted unconditionally the proved lies and refuse to give a retraction. Compared to the Abramoff ring they not only are unapologetic but are continuing the bad news propaganda simply because the law won't force them to do otherwise.
Then, just for once, LIST the names of those taking lies from the Abramoff scandal machine. Show them using the same talking points. Show who are the worst liars and most offensive.
Since it is TRUE, if not called on for illegality, it is way more legitimate than the BS they use to foul the public discourse away from an important scandal.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message |