Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney in Latest Time: "We Inherited" 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:37 AM
Original message
Cheney in Latest Time: "We Inherited" 9/11
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1548061,00.html

Nation

Exclusive Interview: Cheney on Elections and Iraq
The Vice President talks to TIME about why he thinks the G.O.P. will maintain control of both the House and Senate, and admits he may have been "premature" in saying "we were over the hump in terms of violence" in Iraq
By MIKE ALLEN AND JAMES CARNEY/WASHINGTON


- snip -

TIME: Mr. Vice President, while you cited the economic record ... history will probably judge on its international accomplishments. How do you think -- or how would you like -- history to judge this presidency or this administration?

Cheney: Well, I think -- my guess is that the judgment will be very favorable. And I say that primarily because of what we've had to deal with, the fact that we inherited a situation, obviously, where the -- all the planning and preparation for 9/11 was underway, and then 9/11 itself sort of, in effect, has shaped the context within which we've governed. It has been -- 9/11 and the aftermath have really been sort of the dominate feature of the landscape, if you will, that we've had to steer our way through during the course of this administration. And I put that within the broader context of the global war on terror.

We went from a situation where in the '90s I think generally terrorist attacks were looked upon as law enforcement problems. And what 9/11 brought home to everybody was, in fact, we were at war. Our adversaries knew it before we did. They declared war on us back in the '90s, but the U.S. didn't really respond on a strategic level until after 9/11.

And with 9/11, we have been very aggressive in terms of both carrying the fight to the enemy, going after the terrorists, going after the state sponsors of terror, going after those who could conceivably equip the terrorists with deadlier technologies than they've used before. The ultimate threat here isn't 19 guys armed with airliners; it's 19 guys in the middle of one of our cities with a nuclear weapon. That's the ultimate threat we have to deal with these days. And all of that was brought home by 9/11.

I think it also needs to be evaluated in terms of what's happened here at home, and the fact that we have now for more than five years successfully prevented another attack on the homeland. But nobody can promise there won't be another one. It's not that kind of proposition. But there is no question but I think any objective observer will look at it and say, on 9/11 we lost 3,000 people to 19 guys who had box cutters and airline tickets and obviously took us by surprise, took the nation by surprise, demonstrated our vulnerability, if you will.

But since then, in spite the fact that there have been attacks around the world, and that there have been numerous attempts here to mount attacks against the United States, through the measures we've taken -- the Terrorist Surveillance Program, the Patriot Act, the detainee program that we run through the CIA -- all of those things have allowed us to successfully fend off any further attack against the homeland. That's a remarkable achievement.

MORE AT LINK IF YOU CAN STOMACH IT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911911 911911 911911911
911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911

After all, everything changed on 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's a lie but
no matter what it happened under their watch..."they broke it, they got to pay for it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Remarkable that any publication still gives this thoroughly discredited
shithead the time of day, much less a forum to continue spewing his thoroughly discredited shit. They inherited a situation. ALL administrations inherit situations. They had it in their hot little hands for 8 months, and did fuck-all about it. Took the nation by surprise, my foot. Yeah, while you and Condi Rice IGNORED what Richard Clarke and George Tenet were telling you. And this constant hitting of the word "homeland". I've cringed for 5 years every time I hear that construction.

No, I can't stomach reading the rest of it. Thanks for the warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarbonDate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Back to their ABC's.
Always
Blame
Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. MORE AT LINK IF YOU CAN STOMACH IT..........
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. 19 guys in the middle of one of our cities with a nuclear weapon
Darth Chenious = their salesman... :grr:

snip from: Doing Business With The Enemy (60 minutes)

"...specific companies that have invested in these rogue countries, including Halliburton, Conoco-Phillips and General Electric. And he points out that New York's pension funds own nearly $1 billion worth of stock in these three Fortune 500 companies, which have operations in Iran and Syria.

What was Thompson’s reaction when he found out about this? “Anger that there were companies that could be contributing to attacks on our nation,” he says. “You’d think to yourself, well, why would they do that? … I didn't think they could. And more than anything it was, you thought, that the law prevented them from doing this.” In fact, U.S. law does ban virtually all commerce with the rogue nations, but there's a loophole that G.E., Conoco-Phillips and Halliburton have exploited:

The law does not apply to any foreign or offshore subsidiary so long as it is run by non-Americans.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/22/60minutes/main595214.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. how many attacks were there the 8 years before 9-11?
Can somebody ask that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Who sold weapons to Saddam?
Edited on Sun Oct-22-06 05:14 AM by Skidmore
Who paid bin Laden to fight the Soviet Union? Who bankrolled the Taliban? Who bankrolled the Shah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
filer Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. What a cheery way to begin the day...
up close and personal with Buckshot Cheney. Sorry, just couldn't make it past the first page. Was feeling nauseous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. Freudian slip: "all the planning and preparation for 9/11 was underway"
Yeah, he would sure know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. What was he doing in the 9 months prior to 9/11?
Oh yeah, Scalia won't let us know the truth. Darth was busy planning the hostile acquisition of Iraqi National Oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Dick Cheney - VP War Mongering/Profiteering
Government has made Dick a very rich man. I wonder how he sleeps at night knowing that his his millions have been made on the death and misery of millions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. "All the planning and preparation for 911 was underway" ...CONFESSION?
THANKS FOR YOUR FREUDIAN SLIP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. I can't wait till we get that AssHat to lie under oath...
when he's investigated for his involvement with the NoBid Halliburton contracts, the secret "Energy Summit" and all of the rest of his crimes.

His time is coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC