Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Legal Question regardign Gay Marriages: Cross-border consistency?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 08:41 AM
Original message
Legal Question regardign Gay Marriages: Cross-border consistency?

I know very little about US law, and would be interested to find out about this.

If a gay couple marry or register as domestic parters or whatever in a state that recognises the marriage, will this recognition have to be maintained by states that don't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. and, as an aside,
will U.S. states recognize gay marriages from Canada?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on the laws of the individual country (or state(s) within).
It's as simple as that, so if you're going to travel, read up on its customs and mainstream practices - some countries openly dislike gay people too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, it's the US I'm asking about.

Is there anything in federal law that pertains to this situation? Can the feds bust local cops for refusing to allow a married gay man visit his partner in hospital in an gay-unfriendly state?

Federal law trumps State law, I thought...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Article IV, Section 1 of the US Constitution:
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.


A gay couple married in Mass is married everywhere else, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatsFan2004 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That part of the Constitution and a Federal marriage act are
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 09:33 AM by PatsFan2004
in conflict and have yet to be fully tested in court. The Federal marriage act specifically allows states to not recognize other states marriage laws regarding gay marriage. And as we know, many states have passed anti-gay marriage amendments to their state constitutions.

The IRS does not recognize gay marriage with regard to taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So, which takes precedence? The Constitution or DOMA?
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 09:52 AM by baldguy
The Constitution, of course. Its a sad fact that our politicians sometimes fail to live up to its high ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatsFan2004 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. There is the second sentence in Section 1 that states that
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 03:47 PM by PatsFan2004
Congress shall prescribe the manner .....

So a right leaning SC could interpret the Constitution to allow Congress to do just that with the DOMA.

As an example, you may be fully licensed to own a weapon in your state, but New York City will not recognize this license. The courts have approved this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. This was brought up in the mixed-race marriage debate too
Many states refused to recognize mixed race marriages performed in other states. It might be helpful to look at the cases from that time to see how this article was applied.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC