Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak: ‘This Is Going To Be 1 Of Least Important Elections I Have Seen'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:41 AM
Original message
Novak: ‘This Is Going To Be 1 Of Least Important Elections I Have Seen'
Edited on Sun Oct-22-06 11:48 AM by kpete
I think Novak is in for a BIG surprise - kpete

Novak: ‘This Is Going To Be One Of The Least Important Elections That I Have Seen’

Yet some conservatives are trying to downplay the stakes of the upcoming election. This morning on Meet the Press, conservative pundit Robert Novak said, “I would make the argument that this is one of the least important elections that I have seen.”

FULL TRANSCRIPT

RUSSERT: Would a Democratic majority go wild, or govern from the middle? Bob Novak?

NOVAK: There’s going to be a subpoena onslaught, which may or may not be politicaly beneficial. I have never found, in my time in Washington, that these congressional investigations are that effective. I know that in six years of investigating everything possible in the Clinton administration, the Republican Congress was not all that effective.

Tim, let me say this. All politicians always say that this is the most important election that we’ve ever been in, because it is to them. I would make the argument that this is one of the least important elections that I have seen because everybody is really looking ahead to 2008 as an important election. Because if the Democrats win the House, as is probable, they can make and pass a lot of legislation, get nowhere in the Senate — the Senate is a very difficult thing to get through — and the President will suddenly discover his veto pen that he had lost track of for six years. I don’t think that much will happen substantively. It is a nice thing for Nancy Pelosi to be Speaker of the House. But I don’t think there’s going to be much action out of her.

VIDEO AT: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/22/novak-elections/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Keep telling yourself that Bob
Wonder when the indictments start rolling out, how much importance you will lend it then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Umm, maybe because the Repuke Congress wasn't interested in the truth?
That ever occur to a member of the undead like you, Novak?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good! Stay home and concede defeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bob better get on that flight to Paraguay w/ the bush family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of course the Clinton investigations
weren't effective, they were purely political and the repukes knew that. They took a story line and ran with it to get headlines all the while knowing it was based on false accusations. The dems will have plenty to investigate if they get the subpoena power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. actually, the dynamics and long term consequences are very interesting
it's entirely possible that any democratic control will be a bad thing long term, because it lets the disgraced republicans blame the democrat house or democratic congress. whereas, if they were to actually retain control of both houses, they have NO ONE to blame. they'd try, of course, but it wouldn't be credible.

novak is correct that democrats won't be able to create a whole lot of anything that actually becomes law; on the other hand, they can prevent yet more disgraced republican crap from becoming law.

if democrats control at least the house, the next two years would be gridlock and mostly positioning for the 2008 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. There it is again...
Novak: "I know that in six years of investigating everything possible in the Clinton administration, the Republican Congress was not all that effective."

Republican projection. They are just naturally so corrupt that they assume everyone else is. It never dawns on them that the reason they found so little on the Clintonistas is that there was so little there. (So little THERE there, as Bill would say.)

The Puggies can understand any form of chicanery because they know what they themselves are doing, but honesty is quite alien and therefore utterly incomprehensible to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. "six years of investigating everything possible"
Novak openly admits that the Cabal conducted a political witchhunt from 94-2000.

I can never decide if the assclowns are stupid or arrogant or both.

Anyhow, to answer the question, the center right party will rule from the center right, which will be a modest improvement over the far right idiocy of the last six years.

And to answer some other post here: no it would not be better if the cabal remained in control of all three branches of the federal government, even if the center-right party gets some of the blame for the final collapse of the Iraqi Debacle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Blahb Novak....who gives a rat's ass what Blahb thinks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Douchebag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. And we all know Novakula is always right
Why, I remember him in 1993 predicting that Clinton's "biggest tax increase in the history of the world" would ruin the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ole bob is underestimating the furor of a woman isn't he
Nancy Pelosi is no joke....that's why they are trying to poisen her to the public....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC