Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secrecy Report Card 2005 (Govt Secrecy Carries a Hefty Price)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 10:08 AM
Original message
Secrecy Report Card 2005 (Govt Secrecy Carries a Hefty Price)
Stats/graphs on chimp's regime..less open, more secrets

http://www.openthegovernment.org/otg/SRC2005.pdf

_____________

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=30195

During 2004, the George W. Bush administration issued more secret court orders, spent 148 dollars creating new classified documents for every dollar spent releasing old ones, invoked the "state secrets" privilege in court cases more frequently than ever before, and received 25 percent more requests for documents under the Freedom of Information Act.
For every dollar the federal government spent releasing old secrets, it spent 148 dollars creating new ones -- a 28-dollar jump from 2003. In contrast, from 1997 to 2001, the government spent less than 20 dollars per year keeping secrets for every dollar spent declassifying them.

The government spent 7.2 billion dollars securing classified information, more than any annual cost in at least a decade. With 15.6 million new documents stamped "secret" in fiscal year 2004, the government created 81 percent more secrets than it did in the year prior to the terrorist attacks of Sep. 11, 2001.

Nearly two-thirds of the 7,045 meetings of federal advisory committees that fall under the Federal Advisory Committee Act were completely closed to the public, undermining one purpose of the law.

At least 62 new state laws expanded secrecy in 2004 while only 38 strengthened open government. The government now uses at least 50 types of designations to restrict unclassified information deemed "sensitive but unclassified". Many of these numerous terms are duplicative, vague, and endanger the protection of necessary secrets by allowing excessive secrecy to prevail in our open society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too much math for the backside of the Bell Curve to understand.
BushCo counts on ignorant Americans (his base's base) to ignore reports like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC