Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FISA was UPDATED AND AMENDED in 1995 - its not "out of date"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:12 AM
Original message
FISA was UPDATED AND AMENDED in 1995 - its not "out of date"





Read.
Comprehend.
Impeach.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeh, but the friggin constitution must be interpreted as if we were still
living in 17 fucking 80. Asshole hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Listening to * saying the law was out of date but that he didn't break it
was painful. What an idiot.

Why won't someone inthe press corps (Helen, David?) ask him why he keeps lying when he says he took an oath to protect the people? He took an oath to uphold the constituiton. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Lying Asshole Faux Texan Cowboy Wannabe:
April, 2004:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/04/20040420-2.html

"Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. I imagine that by **'s reckoning,
1995 is outdated, too.

It's a different world, don't ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC