Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I was right (U.S. says more GIs may be needed in Iraq)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 07:19 PM
Original message
I was right (U.S. says more GIs may be needed in Iraq)
Edited on Tue Oct-24-06 07:22 PM by bluestateguy
Many people, including on this board, insisted that there would be this dramatic draw down of forces from Iraq prior to the election. Bush and his neo-con cabal would declare "victory" in the war.

I said it wouldn't happen. I knew it wouldn't happen.

I was right.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061024/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_061024185442

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Two weeks before U.S. midterm elections, American officials unveiled a timeline Tuesday for Iraq's Shiite-led government to take specific steps to calm the world's most dangerous capital and said more U.S. troops might be needed to quell the bloodshed.

U.S. officials previously said they were satisfied with troop levels and had expected to make significant reductions by year's end. But a surge in sectarian killings, which welled up this past summer, forced them to reconsider.

At a rare joint news conference with the American ambassador, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. George Casey, said additional U.S. troops could come from inside or outside Iraq to "improve basic services for the population of Baghdad."

"Now, do we need more troops to do that? Maybe. And, as I've said all along, if we do, I will ask for the troops I need, both coalition and Iraqis," Casey said. There are currently 144,000 U.S. forces in Iraq.


more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep my family just got stop lost for the fourth time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. How many middle east nations are helping "quell the bloodshed"?
saudi arabia?

kuwait?

syria?

pakistan?

oh wait, they are dictatorships, not much interested in democracy talking hold in their neighborhood.

iran?

no, it's all in favor of the shiite revolution taking over all of iraq.

gee maybe the iraqis could quell the bloodshed themselves since they are the perpatrators of it these days.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think they are talking about more troops in Baghdad
from elsewhere in Iraq

I also think they are trying to have it both ways:

Pretending to not stay the course by staying the course
and staying the course by more of the same course

of course they could be pulling the we'll stand down whne they stand up card too.

It's effed up. They are trying to win the election by playing with fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. I knew it also
I had the feeling that something like this month was in the pipe, even if they do transfer strength to baghdad, that's going to leave a vaccum in another part of the country. It's a giant game of whack a mole and we're losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC