Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jim Webb's name cut off ballot!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 12:59 AM
Original message
Jim Webb's name cut off ballot!!!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/23/AR2006102301178.html

These bastards will stoop to the lamest of shenanigans.

Seems that his name on the ballot is James H "Jim......NO LAST NAME!!!

im seething
:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. the reason - "Webb" is too long a last name?
unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. We know, and have known since earlier today. I'm sure Webb
knows by now, and if it's fixable, it will be. Also, it's on a page that has no impact on voters IIRC.
So it is not that bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. the article says it IS fixable
and they ARENT going to fix it.

Sorry if its a repost but i went back two through pages of GD and saw nothing, so I dont think everyone knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. If you read the article it says
"Although the problem creates some voter confusion, it will not cause votes to be cast incorrectly, election officials emphasized. The error shows up only on the summary page, where voters are asked to review their selections before hitting the button to cast their votes. Webb's full name appears on the page where voters choose for whom to vote."

This is still pretty lame on several accounts. James Webb is not exactly Daniel Rostenkowski --- in other words its a pretty short name. I can't believe that reprogramming to have the summary page capable of displaying names in a smaller font is a big deal, or something that has to be put off until 2007. Worse still, election officials have known about the problem since 2003. Innocent bumbling or nefarious interference by election officials --- either way this is mother's milk to Rove and his ilk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracyjo Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. I felt that way at first too
But if someone goes in to change it, what else is going to happen? I think we need to let people know about it and leave it as it is. If they do manage to change it, they need to make sure the (R) shows up after felix's name too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Go figure that the company, Hart Intercivics, is from Austin.
The one that makes the machines. Big surprise, eh?

Alexandria and Falls Church are a big part of Webb's support base. Hopefully the many well educated and well informed voters there won't be bamboozled by this.

If the machines aren't outright stealing votes in addition to this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The company that made the machines has nothing to do with this.
The morans who configured it for this election are the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. some programs do have a character length limit
years ago when I worked for customer service for a mail order company - the most common occurance of cutting off a name due to character length was when entering the first name of "CHRISTOPHER". The program would chop it off and display it as "christopE" (drops the 'r')

however in this case it makes no sense

James H. Webb (including spaces/punctuation) contains 13 letters

George Allen (including space) contains) 12 letters


Webb's name has been cut to 7 characters as "James H"

If the program limited characters consistently - George Allen's name would be displayed as "george__" (with space after george = 7 characters)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes it's not adequately explained in the article at all. They say increased
font size makes long words get cut off.

OK.

Then how come with short, "ordinary names" like James Webb, his WHOLE LAST NAME is cut off, and a George Allen's party affiliation is cut off?

This stinks to high heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. here's something else that STUNK
this year's primary - we went to vote

normally, outside the polling place, or just inside the entry way, a poster size ballot is displayed so voters can review it before voting

in the past all candidates names/party and special questions/resolutions etc are on it

this year - we go and take a look at the poster before entering the polling place

the only DEMS listed on the poster were ones running for local party slots or ones running for local offices

NO DEMS were listed for Senate or the House at the state/fed level

but all the REPUBS were listed

we asked the people at the registration desk about this... :shrug:
we asked if on the REAL ballot were the DEM names there... :shrug:

we did vote - the dems were on the 'real' ballot - but we were wondering how many other polling places had the same 'poster' and if people DIDN'T vote because the DEMS were missing from the poster

we did report it, and got a "gee, that's strange..."

granted we live in a very small town (more cows than people) - but both my partner and I asked around at work if any of our co-workers noticed the same thing in their areas. Those that bothered to look at the 'poster' did notice and wondered why the DEMS were left off.

it's going to be interesting to see what the POSTER says on Nov. 7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC