boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 11:58 AM
Original message |
THE FILIBUSTER IS EXTINCT! |
|
Here ye, Here ye, One and All.
If democrats can't use it because of the nuclear option or any other pitious argument, it is already gone, kaput!
I know the Democrats find enough reasons not to use it. Well who can?
The Republicans!
These so called democrats are really pissing me off right now!
I don't give a damn how many will vote NO. I want a FILIBUSTER.
Answer to all you people who want the same thing, don't give it a second thought, the FILIBUSTER is already dead, extinct.
I hope I'm wrong.......
|
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No, it's in fine shape |
|
You don't think the Republicans could maintain a filibuster if they needed to?
Naw, they could.
Harry Reid has compromised the notion of Democrats having the spine even to attempt a filibuster when he dropped to his knees at Frist's threat of a "nuclear option," which was always a fiction.
Now, the Democrats are standing on their own dicks, wondering where that pain is coming from.
No leadership - no agenda - no backbone. I'm sick of the Democrats in Congress, save for Jack Murtha - who stood alone.
|
mom cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Damn the nukes...full speed ahead! |
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
3. they used it last month on ANWR |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Uhmm repukes didn't threaten the nuclear option over anwr. but they |
|
do over judicial appointees!
|
sleipnir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's never coming back, this was the last shot, it's over for the Filibuster. Welcome to the new Rubber Stamp Senate.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |