MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:41 PM
Original message |
Poll question: What's In A Name? (NJ same-sex marriage) |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-25-06 02:50 PM by MrCoffee
The New Jersey Supreme Court held that same-sex couples are entitled to equal social and economic status as opposite-sex couples, but that the State does not have to call it marriage.
What do you think? Is the word "marriage" crucial to the issue?
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Edited because the poll dropped the quotation marks when i posted it |
nam78_two
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. A troll seems to have voted for # 4 |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM by nam78_two
Same-sex couples don't have the "right" to use the word marriage? :eyes:
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I fixed that option...the poll got all jacked up when i originally posted it |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Separate but equal partnership ... |
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. i gave the NJSCt opinon a quick scan, and i don't think that's a fair |
|
assessment.
It looks like the NJSCt is pretty serious about making every right and privilege available to opposite-sex married couples equally available to same-sex couples.
|
TheBaldyMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
5. as long as it carries the same legal protection it doesn't matter ... |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-25-06 02:49 PM by TheBaldyMan
what you call it.
Here in the UK we've had 'civil partnerships' for a couple of years now. Finally the politicians came round to the view as the vast majority of the population. People call it getting married or a civil ceremony or whatever.
As long as couples can settle down and be happy together that's the important thing.
on edit: oops, voted before the options changed - change mine from other to first option.
|
Gormy Cuss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Civil marriage isn't connected with religious rites of marriage |
|
except in the minds of pea brains who don't understand that when they are married in a religious ceremony it's only legal because the state has granted that privilege to the officiant.
I don't like playing word games. If the pea brains can be shut up by calling the civil event a 'union' I'm fine with that so long as 'civil union' is the only recognized legal term for what is now deemed 'marriage' in civil law.
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
8. WOW. I'm honestly surprised by the results so far. |
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
9. The rights are paramount |
|
After all, you can call it whatever you want to, even if the state has gotten stuffy about it so the preachers won't get offended.
|
sallyseven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thank god. Massachusetts has been the only |
|
sane state so far. It did not change anything in my life, nor my childrens, not any of my relatives either. It doesn't hurt and you won't even notice that gays can marry. Some people are just too stupid to understand.
|
HarukaTheTrophyWife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-25-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Yes it is important. There is no such thing as seperate but equal. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |