Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's In A Name? (NJ same-sex marriage)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:41 PM
Original message
Poll question: What's In A Name? (NJ same-sex marriage)
Edited on Wed Oct-25-06 02:50 PM by MrCoffee
The New Jersey Supreme Court held that same-sex couples are entitled to equal social and economic status as opposite-sex couples, but that the State does not have to call it marriage.

What do you think? Is the word "marriage" crucial to the issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edited because the poll dropped the quotation marks when i posted it
sorry about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. A troll seems to have voted for # 4
Edited on Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM by nam78_two
Same-sex couples don't have the "right" to use the word marriage? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I fixed that option...the poll got all jacked up when i originally posted it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Separate but equal partnership ...
Jim Crow matrimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. i gave the NJSCt opinon a quick scan, and i don't think that's a fair
assessment.

It looks like the NJSCt is pretty serious about making every right and privilege available to opposite-sex married couples equally available to same-sex couples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. as long as it carries the same legal protection it doesn't matter ...
Edited on Wed Oct-25-06 02:49 PM by TheBaldyMan
what you call it.

Here in the UK we've had 'civil partnerships' for a couple of years now. Finally the politicians came round to the view as the vast majority of the population. People call it getting married or a civil ceremony or whatever.

As long as couples can settle down and be happy together that's the important thing.

on edit: oops, voted before the options changed - change mine from other to first option.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Civil marriage isn't connected with religious rites of marriage
except in the minds of pea brains who don't understand that when they are married in a religious ceremony it's only legal because the state has granted that privilege to the officiant.

I don't like playing word games. If the pea brains can be shut up by calling the civil event a 'union' I'm fine with that so long as 'civil union' is the only recognized legal term for what is now deemed 'marriage' in civil law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. WOW. I'm honestly surprised by the results so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. The rights are paramount
After all, you can call it whatever you want to, even if the state has gotten stuffy about it so the preachers won't get offended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thank god. Massachusetts has been the only
sane state so far. It did not change anything in my life, nor my childrens, not any of my relatives either. It doesn't hurt and you won't even notice that gays can marry. Some people are just too stupid to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes it is important. There is no such thing as seperate but equal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC