Btw, here's a recent press release from NV Chapter of NOW. I posted it yesterday, but it didn't get much attention. I think NOW has an important message about this incident:
NV Chpt. National Organization of Women Speaks Out @ Jim Gibbons
10/24/2006
Unlucky Jim
There appears to be a substantial school of thought in the local media, and perhaps in the community at large, that if any crime was committed in connection with Jim Gibbons flirting/not flirting, waiting/not waiting for and touching/not touching inappropriately that woman, it is the crime of political stupidity. What could Sig and Jim possibly have been thinking to be out drinking with women? How could Gibbons have been so careless as to walk around with a woman that wasn't his wife, and this close to the election, too? Poor Sig. Unlucky Jim.
Poor ... Chrissy Mazzeo? Hey, that's not in the approved narrative. Who's not on board?
The Nevada chapter of the National Organization of Women:
The woman who had been with Congressman Jim Gibbons and then called the police last Friday night, October 13, to report that she had been assaulted by the Congressman, later stated that she did not wish the incident to be further investigated. She did not recant her story; she confirmed that she believed that she had been the victim of an attempted assault. Like so many victims before her, she did not feel it would make a difference to continue with her complaint, because as she stated, "cause who he is and I just don't want to go up against something like that."
While most of the media coverage has focused on discrepancies between differing accounts of the evening, Nevada NOW recognizes that this incident is "just" one more sad example of a serious problem in our state: too many women are afraid that their stories are not be heard fairly -- in the press or in the political or the criminal justice systems. The tragedy of this event is not the impact on Congressman Gibbons' political ambitions; it is the horrific prospect that a human being who believes herself to be the victim of an assault did not believe she could trust the criminal justice system and the media to protect her basic human right of personal security.
This woman's fear of not receiving fair treatment is sadly well founded. Ordinary women who feel they have been assaulted or battered cannot expect multiple officers to respond to their complaint, as occurred Friday night. Far more common is for women who seek help to be ridiculed, not believed or arrested themselves. Indeed, Sheriff Young pointed out as much himself, in Saturday's Sun, when he said that "This thing would not have amounted to anything, if it was anybody but the Congressman" that she mentioned in her 9-1-1 call. Indeed, Nevada NOW was very disappointed that the Sheriff belittled concern for this woman's complaint, implying that any such concern about a possible assault must motivated by "the political ramifications" rather than an interest in the well-being of this woman and all women.
Nevada NOW continues to defend her right to anonymity and her autonomy to determine for herself whether or not she wishes to stay out of the public eye. But there remains a long-standing issue for women in Nevada that has not been raised in most press coverage of this incident or in this year's elections, especially for sheriff, attorney general and governor - which is the need to increase support for women who believe they have been the victims of sexual assault, which is still not considered a priority crime in our state. As the woman pleaded of the 9-1-1 operator, "I just want to feel safe."
If any good might come from this event, it would be a genuine focus on the issue of sexual assault against women in our public policy, with the goal of reaching the day when all women will feel that they can tell their stories without fear of repercussion and with the knowledge that they can expect personal safety, fair treatment, and when needed, real assistance. We have urged and continue to urge the press to cover the positions of candidates for Sheriff, Attorney General and Governor on how best to improve this situation. Some candidates have laid out detailed plans on this issue; others have not addressed it all. Nevada NOW continues to believe that the issue of sexual assault has not received the attention it deserves in this year's election coverage. We hope that there will be greater discussion of this and other issues of importance to women in Nevada for the remainder of the campaign season.
Well, that probably ain't gonna happen. And in Gibbons' case, it's probably for the best, because the only method he's displayed of discussing any issue is through ads characterized by misspellings, deliberate inaccuracies and outright lies.
But a prevailing interpretation of this event's "tragedy" seems to be that gosh. it's just too darned bad if the governor's race is decided by what some commentators prefer to judge as a collapse of campaign discipline rather than an allegation of sexual assault. Kudos to Nevada Now for departing from the storyline. Needed to be said.
UPDATE: The Sun shines on NOW and other women's organizations, drags in DA David Roger. Hey, the DA is a Sig Rogich crony. What are the odds?
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
