Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: I'm trying to figure out a matrix that says things are getting better

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:09 AM
Original message
Bush: I'm trying to figure out a matrix that says things are getting better
Edited on Thu Oct-26-06 09:09 AM by Crankie Avalon
Bush: In search of "a matrix that says things are getting better"

In an interview with "conservative journalists" Wednesday -- he must have checked the "liberal media" off his list with Wednesday morning's press conference -- George W. Bush complained that his administration's decision not to brag about enemy body counts in Iraq has made it hard for him to persuade the American people that the United States is winning the war in Iraq.

"We have made a conscious effort not to be a body-count team," the National Review's Byron York quotes the president as saying. Bush says the administration's restraint "gives you the impression that are just there -- kind of moving around, directing traffic, and somebody takes a shot at them and they're down."

Of course, the administration hasn't been as body-count-free as Bush suggests. Among the top stories on the Defense Department's Web site just now: "Coalition Soldiers Kill Six Insurgents, Seize Weapons."

But Bush says he has "thought long and hard about this" and realizes that Americans are getting frustrated. "A lot of people are just saying, 'You’re not doing enough to win. We're not winning, you're not doing enough to win, and I'm frustrated, I want it over with, with victory.' And I'm trying to figure out a matrix that says things are getting better. I think that one way to measure is less violence than before, I guess."

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/

Incredible. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do what your idiot supporters do!
Edited on Thu Oct-26-06 09:42 AM by Turbineguy
Listen to O'Reilly, Coulter, Hannity and Limbaugh. If they say it's so, it must be so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obuscate and Deny
"And I'm trying to figure out a matrix that says things are getting better. I think that one way to measure is less violence than before, I guess."


Catapult the propaganda

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. What?
What the hell is a "matrix that says things are getting better"? Jay-SUS, this man is an idiot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. He cares more about dreaming up some way to spin things getting better...
Edited on Thu Oct-26-06 09:29 AM by Crankie Avalon
...than about actually doing concrete things to truly make things better.

It's like presenting a Christmas gift to someone and expecting them to care more about the pretty bow and giftwrapping than about the ten pound turd that's actually inside the box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I think he meant 'metric' --something to measure by, but then again
maybe he meant 'matrix' in the sense of an array of variables used to form a judgment about "progress" in Iraq. But in this case that would be an array of variables created by excluding items that would otherwise ordinarily be used, but which are trending negative, and instead, using only variables that are positive, or which are irrelevant and would not ordinarily be used, to give a misleadingly positive picture of developments in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. It means he's trying to find a way to put a positive spin on the Iraq war.
Of course telling us that he's doing that is just fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. He doesn't know how to measure success or failure
A matrix??? He must be trying to fit the war into some kind of MBA business model. All his "benchmark" talk. Well, he ran down several businesses probably because he couldn't measure failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why worry about a Matrix? Why not
just continue to lie and state things are getting better? It's been the standard play for the last 3.5 years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too many 'Murricans taking the red pill!
Stop it, get back in the matrix!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think he means a rubric.
Rubric: a scoring guide for evaluating the quality of work or products to answer the question: What does mastery, and varying degrees of mastery, look like? Has three essential features: evaluative criteria, quality definitions, and a scoring strategy, which may be either holistic or analytic.

Actually, it would be kinda nice to see such a rubric - though why he thinks we'd be scoring above "Needs Work" I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. "The longer we hold onto control, the less likely the nation
will ever elect fascist thugs again."

See, things ARE getting better. If you look at it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. That man loves to catapult the propoganda.
In other words - the lies aren't working anymore; gotta be another angle that'll work. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Just slap up more signs that say "Mission Accomplished"
or "Path to Victory". That ought to do it. :eyes:

WORST.PRESIDENT.EVER.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-26-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. I guess this will be his next speech:
"The first matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect, it was a work of art, flawless, sublime. A triumph equaled only by its monumental failure. The inevitability of its doom is as apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being, thus I redesigned it based on your history to more accurately reflect the varying grotesqueries of your nature. However, I was again frustrated by failure. I have since come to understand that the answer eluded me because it required a lesser mind, or perhaps a mind less bound by the parameters of perfection. Thus, the answer was stumbled upon by another, an intuitive program, initially created to investigate certain aspects of the human psyche. If I am the father of the matrix, she would undoubtedly be its mother."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC