Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

G. GREENWALD ASKS:What is the Real Reason Admin Violated FISA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:29 PM
Original message
G. GREENWALD ASKS:What is the Real Reason Admin Violated FISA?
The significance of the Administration's June, 2002 statements about FISA
Glenn Greenwald

(last 4 paragraphs, read it all at:
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/01/significance-of-administrations-june.html

..................

....... The Administration scrambled for a full month to explain why they had to eavesdrop outside of the very permissive FISA scheme, to explain why they eavesdropped with no judicial oversight even though the law makes it a criminal offense to do so. We had been fed nothing but incoherent gibberish about the need for "speed and agility" in this "different war."

Now we finally heard an explanation from the Administration as to why they supposedly had to eavesdrop in violation of FISA -- because FISA supposedly was too rigid to allow the eavesdropping they wanted to do -- and that explanation is clearly false, as proven by the Administration's own statements and conduct at the time.

Leaving aside the always-paramount fact that the Administration has no right in our system of government to simply violate laws when it claims it has a good reason to break the law – and that principle, from start to finish, is what this scandal is about – the fact that the Administration is disseminating patently false explanations for why it violated the law does also leave the quite pressing and still unanswered question:

What is the real reason the Administration chose to eavesdrop in violation of FISA -- i.e., in secret and with no oversight -- rather than within FISA and with oversight? There is still no viable answer to that question from the Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. can't find the page
When I click on the link, it tells me the page is not found on their server.

Do you have a better link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. can't find the page
When I click on the link, it tells me the page is not found on their server.

Do you have a better link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Link not working. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Try this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Much better.
I agree completely with the article. It has been obvious from the moment that this scandal broke that the administration was lying about motive, means, and results. As usual, with few exceptions, the whoremedia has been mindlessly repeating the lies while not covering the few brave souls that have been presenting different accounts. The exceptions are the Newsweek story that clearly documented Echelon, how it works, and how it is not remotely 'wiretaps on suspects', and of course the original NYT story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC