Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good news/bad news-Lieberman to Oppose - Byrd to Support Alito

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:41 PM
Original message
Good news/bad news-Lieberman to Oppose - Byrd to Support Alito
Lieberman to Oppose - Byrd to Support Alito

Good news/bad news on Alito. Word is that Joe Lieberman (D-CT) will opppose Alito when he comes to the floor later today. On the other hand, it appears there will now be at least 3 Democrats to break ranks and support Alito - word is that Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) will support Alito.

http://realvalues.blogspot.com/2006/01/lieberman-to-oppose-byrd-to-support.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Byrd to support?
Isn't he the guy who carries the Constitution in his pocket? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was almost in tears when I called his office yesterday
guess that did not work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. He needed more calls from his constituents, not
from out-of-staters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I called -- and I'm a West Virginian
I'm only sorry it seems to have had no sway on the Senator's decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. byrd is emminently porkable
he's VERY big on getting federal dollars for his state (and he's quite prodigious at it). which means the banana republicans can lure him over to the dark side every now and again in exchange for some nice juicy pork.

that said, he is also often a man of principle, particularly when the constitution is involved, and this news is very disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. No surprise - Byrd is very social conservative and deferential to
powers, sadly.

I had hope that Alito's record on mines security would make the difference, but I guess this was not even enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. yup, he is a virulent homophobe , too, sadly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. Yep. Byrd has always been a conservative 'southern Democrat.'
His social conservatism and cooperation with mining interests have been long-established.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anybody getting the idea that
the Dems are in conference saying "Look, we need to pull out so many Dem votes. You know, so it covers if any repubs vote against him. Gotta look good for GW. But lets mix it up this time. I think the constituents are starting to catch on."

I swear that's what's going on.

Maybe too tinfoil hat, but man, my hunches are PRETTY good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Huh?
This makes no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Good Cop (Dems) vs. Bad Cop (Pubs)
Except in this scenario, they're guaranteeing the Bad Cop wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. No surprise for Byrd - Good surprise for Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. why arent you surprised about byrd
to see him for and lieberman against has my head spinning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Look at Byrd's record on these issues and you will see he is very
conservative. A lot of people here mistake his opposition on Iraq for a liberal statement. It is not that.

You can forgive him as he is a man from another time, but dont be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Byrd's always had crappy ACLU and Human Right's Campaign
ratings. One of the worst Democrats in the Senate in fact for those groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. thank you
how sad and pitiful but all too typical i guess
seems mass is right - senator byrd is a man from another (southern) era which does clear up the confusing gaps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. They obviously have dirt on Byrd
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Why - Why do you refuse to see Byrd for who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. Because rhetoric is all that matters. Hillary is a liberal, did you hear?
And if only they would vote NO with every fibre of their being (the english spelling renders the trite cliche so much trit-er) the dems could defeat Alito even if they have fewer votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Are you saying he is a Dirty Byrd?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Whaaaa? Have they "gotten to" Sen. Byrd??
Something in his past that they're holding over his head???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. No
on cultural issues Byrd is no flaming liberal and never has been. He believes in the right of the president to nominate and usually supports that person unless there is incompetnece or criminality found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. But, he MUST see that the entire "co-equal branches" tenet is at stake!
As a "strict constitutionalist," Alito's ideas on unitary executive powers should scare the crap out of him!

I still don't get it... x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Really no surprise for Lieberman--he has always been consistently
pro-choice. NOt too big of a shock for Byrd--if that is what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. I know a lot of people are going to be surprise by Byrd, but there should
be no surprise there.

Yes, Byrd has been awesome on Iraq, but he is as conservative as Landrieu, may be more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I'm surprised because
he's been such a staunch supporter of the Senate's role. Alito threatens to empower the Executive over the Senate in a way I thought Byrd would find unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. And he led the compromise that basically prevents the filibuster.
I cant tell you why Byrd voted like that. I know he was one of the few I was worried (with Landrieu and Pryor).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I'm a little surprised, too
Giving this president unlimited powers seems to be something Byrd would be opposed to, and would outweigh his homophobia and deference to a presidential nominee.

Oh, well. Next time Byrd takes the Senate floor to point at the camera and thunder that we elected 'a president, not a king' I'll remember that it was Byrd's vote who helped make this little ninny a king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Byrd is old school
He has been through these confirmations many times. Unless the nominee has some serious ethical issues or is viewed as incompetent, Byrd will vote aye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. well, he was one of 22 Dems who voted for John Roberts also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Given that Sen. Byrd carries around a copy of the U.S. Constitution --
-- it's really surprising to see him voting for a nominee who favors "the unitary presidency."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I don't believe it!
If Mr Byrd backs Alito, I'll not vote for him in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. BYRD is senile - or a supporter of the 4th Reich? Has he been threatened
so Byrd supports the 4th Reich, surely not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. I thought I had read where Byrd is so afraid of the nuclear
option, that he may be inclined to vote for Alito to avoid it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Maybe Byrd ought to get around to reading that copy of
the Constitution he carries around in his pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Free the Press Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. um, strictly posturing now. Alito to be confirmed - filibuster defeated.
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 02:04 PM by Free the Press
Every Senator shall posture in such a way as to maximize their re-election probability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
29. Call them ALL! Fax them ALL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. Byrd is speaking right now! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. The man who spoke eloquently about Executive Authority w/Iraq Resolution
and helped spur a movement to defy Bush has now taken away with the hand he gaveth.

It was sad for me to see it. Ripped my heart out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsinger Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
37. Alito
Democrats.com is reporting that Kerry is trying to organize a filibuster. It's important to call the big players and keep the pressure on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsinger Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. Alito

There are 42 possible votes for filibuster. Salazar, Landriew and Feinstein must be persuaded to support it. Call them! Fax them! Don't let them off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
42. Wow! Kudos to Lieberman, who I'd long written off and I'm totally confused
about Byrd, who is a real hero to me. I've heard that he is up for reelection and is being trashed by the RW, but surely a man of his stature can do better than this...:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC