Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which will happen first in the U.S.: A black president or a female president?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:04 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which will happen first in the U.S.: A black president or a female president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. A 1/79th "black" male with blonde hair and blue eyes. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You're right. I didn't think of that one.
He'd have to be bi-racial (B&W) but look caucasian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good question
I'm afraid the stereotype of women being weak will take a long time STILL to overcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Demographically speaking 1 in 12 Presidents ought to be black...
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 11:10 PM by originalpckelly
1 in 2 ought to be women.

I don't think that is the case, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Pretty Bad Statistical Math There, With All Due Respect.
It would come down to the ratio of race/gender within those that actually enter politics and try to win to begin with. Those numbers would be much different than simple demographic numbers, and it would be completely inaccurate to use demographic breakdowns for this exercise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
48. No, not for that reason, but I was wrong on the black ratio.
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 08:42 AM by originalpckelly
reflect the demographics of people in America?

I didn't actually divide it right. If there are more than 10 percent the number of Presidents ratio should go down.

Womens figure was right, but 3 in every 25 Presidents should be black.

Now, I said demographically speaking. I am pissed that there haven't been women Presidents or black Presidents, or for that matter gay (about 10%, 1 in 10 Presidents should be gay) or otherwise Presidents.

This country is fucked up. Why the hell can't we just do the right thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #48
67. Like I Said, Demographics Have Nothing To Do With It.
You can spit out the ratios as much as you want, but they are irrelevant for this exercise as I stated. The general demographic ratios have little or nothing to do with who is elected. What does matter, is who runs, since if ya don't run, you're pretty much not going to get elected.

So like I said, the ratios of how many female or black candidates ran weighted against what gender/race won and how frequently, would be the accurate way to go about it. This is the wrong application for demographic numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Temporary1 Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well won't we find out in 2008
If you catch my drift : p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Maybe. Obama's waiting to see how the TN. election turns out
and he's also been shown how race WILL BE A FACTOR if he runs. Barak and his wife are also concerned about assassination and I can say that I don't blame them.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republican, white female.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. You mean this....


Katherine Harris

or



Elizabeth Dole

or



Ann Coulter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'll be shocked if there's EVER a black President in this country.
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 11:26 PM by BlooInBloo
I welcome a future in which I'm shocked.


EDIT: My answer was based on the assumption - which you didn't actually state - that this hypothetical black President was ELECTED - and didn't inherit the office from being VP, Speaker, or something like that. A black President-by-inheritance is easier for me to imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I Wouldn't Be.
Though this is probably a far fetched and silly comparison, I will say that everyone I know who watches and loves 24, also loved and admired the character President Palmer. Any fan of the show that I know would say they wished we had a president like that and how much they loved his character.

If one on tv was that readily accepted, maybe in real life one could be as well. I do recognize that it is a bit more complicated than that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'd vote for Rep. Barbara Lee in a heartbeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. An Hispanic president
They outnumber blacks now.

Or maybe a black hispanic female president. Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes, and how about this guy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Both well before we get an atheist in the White House.
That's for damn sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. or a member of the working class
unless Andrew Jackson counts, and what a disaster that was.

We probably have already had an atheist, but they could not admit that on the campaign trail. Did Nixon, for example, really believe in god?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Sure. All the terrible ones were probably atheists.
You know, because we're all morally deficient. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I wouldn't say that about Sagan, Russell, or Asimov
but then there was Nixon's close association with Billy Graham
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/inaug/history/stories/nixon69.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
38. I guess the thing that bothers me is the assumption that if he's an asshole
he must not be a "true" believer. And we're constantly hearing on DU how Atheism is "another religion" - stop and think, for a minute.. what other religion could you slur like that and get away with it?

"Nixon was so ****, he must have secretly been a ****".

I'm glad you could find 3 examples of atheists who you don't consider morally deficient. But please stop trying to pawn off every Christian (or member of other faith) who acts like a shithead onto us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. Just because they are not Christians
doesn't mean they are atheists. Since, IMO, Christianity commands a person to not be an a$$hole. (John 15: 12 - "My command is this. Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends." James 1:27 "Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.")

If their actions show that they are more than 18 kiloparsecs from Jesus' teachings, then it is only logical to conclude that they are not Christians. That does not imply that they are atheists though. They might be practicing Satanists or Jainists or Zoroastrians for all I know, but it is quite clear that they are not Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. I don't think post #18 was implying anything other than atheism.
But, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. you are correct, it wasn't
but I thought you made a general case, about every a$$hole who claims to be Christian, such as Bush and Cheney. Plus I would say it is more like every atheist has a metaphysical philosophy which is just as unproven and unprovable as any religious metaphysical philosophy. Calling atheism a religion is a shorthand way of saying that, but I would not mean to imply that all metaphysical philosophies under the umbrella of atheism are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #45
60. "proof" doesn't have anything to do with "likelihood"
If you postulate an invisible, odorless, colorless, hidden being who by definition requires faith to believe in, "proof" is damn well impossible. Not to mention the high hurdles in proving a negative. So, yes, atheism is "unproven" just as disbelief in the literal truth of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the tooth fairy, and the Wizard of Oz are equally unproven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. equally unproven?
Then there is a God. From the foreward: "Having this in mind, the story of "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" was written solely to please children of today. It aspires to being a modernized fairy tale, in which the wonderment and joy are retained and the heartaches and nightmare are left out. L. Frank Baum Chicago, April, 1900"

The author admits it to be a children's fairy tale, which is pretty solid proof of the non-existence of a real Wizard of Oz. Ah, if only deutero-Isaiah and Mark, et. al. had been so honest then we wouldn't have all these problems today.

But as Kung writes: "Belief in God is superrational ... but not irrational: there is a reflection on the reality of God emerging from human experience and calling for man's free decision. Belief in God can be justified in the face of a rational critique. It has a basis in the experience of uncertain reality itself, which raises the first and last questions about the condition of its possibility."

note to the OP - sorry for the thread-jacking, but we are keeping your thread kicked, no? I would say a woman President will happen first. For all the sexism of western culture, many western countries have been ruled, at least temporarily by queens. However, they are less likely to be voluntarily ruled by somebody without royal (that is, white) blood. For myself, I have voted both for Geraldine Ferraro and Jesse Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Yep. Equally unproven.
You can't disprove the existence of the Wizard of Oz any more effectively than you can disprove the existence of God.

Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
58. I'm sure several, or more, were either atheists or agnostics
It would be political suicide to ADMIT it, but many, many people have no problem
being less than honest with their constituents.

As Robert Heinlein said "When everyone else around is rubbing blue goo in his/her navel, you also rub blue goo in your navel, looking very solemn while doing so"

(This is a very rough recall of the actual quote, but it pretty well sums up the actions of politicians)

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I'd vote for an atheist President in a heartbeat! Male or Female!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think we'll have a white female President first
Proof: The Louisiana gubernatorial elections, where the electorate preferred a white woman to a man of color.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why not both? Maxine Waters in '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
23. My vote's for a gay, female, Muslim President.
Just to watch a few heads explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. We've Had Many More Female Senators and Governors
We've only had one black governor (Doug Wilder - until Deval Patrick gets in!) and four black Senators in the history of the US. We've got a growing number of female governors and Senators.

But no, I don't think it'll be Hillary Clinton. She's too polarizing a figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. No President will
happen first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. A black republican male
before a female of any color or party.

He will have to be someone like JC Watts before the repukes will nominate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
27. This is Amurika... Won't happen... until Jesus Christ returns...
...as a black woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
28. Corporatist's
of all stripes, genders and sexual preferences are welcome. Interviews to be held on The Hudson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
29. Does it make any difference?
I want my President to be smarter than me, more noble than me, and have the Kahonies to go up against the Neocons and to undo the damage done by this Monkey and his handlers in D.C. I don't care what race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation they are. I just want them to be progressive and bring pride and dignity back to America.


John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
30. Here's my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
31. It depends on the invidual candidate
Obama could possibly win, but someone like Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton can't. In the case of a woman, she might be a conservative-oriented type, rather than someone who leans more to the left. Sadly, I think that the first woman President will be a Republican, but I think that the first black President will be a Democrat because I don't see the Republicans nominating a black candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. rethugs nominate women only to seem "friendly" to women.
They have no intention of letting them win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Not necessarily
I could see someone like Kay Bailey Hutchison being nominated in the near future. While that candidate may not do as well in the polls, if she can get the Republican base excited just enough, she may have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Since rethugs don't respect women as equals, the spin machine
would most likely take care of her actually having a chance at winning. Or, she's win and it would be detrimental to women as she enacted every anti-woman act imaginable to pay back those who put her into office.

A rethuglian woman is bad for all women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. I could see Kay Bailey Hutchison
being the first woman president very easily.

I see her as a natural match as VP for McCain. Should McCain win and die in office, she would be the first female president.

I could also see Hillary beating McCain in 2008 and being the first woman president.

African-American presidents I have a tougher time seeing right now. Colin Powell had a real chance of winning but chose not to run. I don't think Obama would have a chance in the primaries since he's only been in office a few years. I think either Gore or Kerry would beat him assuming Hillary chooses not to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #32
51. Au contraire
They'd let a Margaret Thatcher type win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
33. If it was Oprah Winfrey running, it would be the 1st black female...
Heck, every Republican Woman loves her....

Oprah/Obama '08 - has a good ring to it, doesn't it???

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. rethug women especially love her after o'lielly's appearance.
Apparently, she let him just run nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #37
49. I watched the show -- and that's not an accurate statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. Was o'liely put in his place and shamed?
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 12:53 PM by Kerrytravelers
I could barely stomache watching it as much as I did. He seemed to be running wild on the segments I saw while flipping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
34. None of the bloodlines that are permitted to be president are black
... but they do have females.

I say "female".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
39. Angela Davis for President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
40. How I see it
White female president, hispanic president, mixed race president, native american president and then black female president followed by a black male president. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
41. I thought we already had a black president???
my mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #41
61. You betcha! And his wife will be the first woman President!



:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
46. It'll be Hillary Clinton...
and it will be in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
47. Obama is a long shot at winning in 2008 but Hillary has no shot at winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. I believe HRC has a much better chance than Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. I'm with you LostinVa
I don't see why people think Hillary can't win.

I can see her beating any Republican nominee I can think of, and 2008 might be a very un-Republican year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schmuls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
54. I want a Jewish twice divorced President and a black man for VP:
Obama Barrack. Or vice versa, doesn't *really* matter as long as they are of the same mind. Wonder how it would affect middle eastern foreign relations to have a Jewish American president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schmuls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. I forgot to say that Jewish guy is Russell Feingold, from Wisconsin!!!
YAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. Israel would love it and meanwhile the rest of the ME might prefer Feingold, one of the few
in the Senate to openly question the Bush policies in the Middle East. I'm sure that they realize that a Neo-con and Oilmen are far more threatening to their interests than to their issues with judaism and Israel.

I agree with you though...I think either Feingold/Obama or Obama/Feingold would be fantastic for this country....

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
56. i think a woman/black president will only win on the republican ticket
largely because the sexists/racists are already on their side so this person will probably have to come from them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
57. how many years
before women and minorities have equal rights economically in our economic world?

If a president be a symbol, cool, whatever it takes to drag a racist society
out of its slaving past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
59. I heard a joke once...
A woman is meditating one day when suddenly god appears to her. He congratulates her on the accomplishment and offers to answer any questions she may have. The woman asks, "when will the US have a female president?"

God consults his vast knowledge and replies, "Not in your lifetime... but it shall come to pass."

Later a gay man achieved the same feat of transcendence, and he also was approached by God with the offer to clear up anything he wanted to know. The man asks, "when will the US have a gay president?"

God again thought for an imperceptible fraction of a second and replied, "Not in your lifetime... but it shall come to pass."

Finally a black man is peacefully praying when he, too, feels his mind open up to the universe. God appears to him with the same offer. He says, "when will the US have a black president?"

God just bursts out laughing and says, "Not in my lifetime!"


I didn't really get it when I first heard it, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. Racism is probably the hardest of the three prejudices here to overcome, especially since so many people never see black people, except in a football game or as criminals on the news. The black person is easiest to identify as "the other" due to the apparent physical differences, which people conflate with the culture, which of course is displayed as extremely negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
66. Hillary Clinton
That's my hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC