Any suggestions on the first Congressional investigation of the White House?

[ithinkmyliverhurts]

Where should we begin? Which lie? Which cover-up? Should we go for an easy conviction or just one that will inflict maximum taint (gotta love that double-entendre)?

Scorched earth policy, or should we target investigations that will have everything to do with taking back the WH in '08?

Such a dilemma.

I sure hope all the newly elected democratic congresspeople take a group photo with pitchforks and torches. How would that be for a sense of humor?

[elehhhhna]

1. Iraq War, War Crimes, 9/11, Katrina, GWOT, HAL, some big, fat, juicy AUDITS

and away we go.

(in no particulair order, simultaneously if possible)

[demwing]

2. Easy conviction first

Because then people will get a taste for dish. If an investigation went for the throat, but dragged on for a long time, ADD America would lose interest, and the issue would lose momentum.

[kestrel91316]

3. I recommend approaching the crimes in somewhat

chronological order............just because.

[Graybeard]

4. War profiteering...

...Halliburton, Cheney and cronies on the witness stand.