usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:50 PM
Original message |
| McCaskill opposes Alito nomination |
|
McCaskill and Talent have differed on the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court. McCaskill opposes the nomination; Talent favors it. http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/local/13704016.htmhttp://www.claireonline.com/ |
| pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. but does she support a Fillibuster? |
| w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. We're talking Missouri here... |
|
...opposing the nomination is good enough for now. Heck, she's not even in the Senate yet. But hearing this makes me more willing to work to get her there.
|
| deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Hopefully she'll kick Talent's ass in November. We need a (D) senator from Missouri. :bounce:
|
| TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. It's unfortunate for us that Claire has not yet |
|
been elected to the Senate...........maybe her opposition to the alito nomination can be enforced retroactively!
I can dream, can't I?
|
| WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-26-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. She would vote "NO" but not support a filibuster, according to Kos |
|
but if she were actually in the Senate--who knows for sure.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
