From the NYT article:
A poll conducted in mid-October for The South Florida Sun-Sentinel showed Mr. Mahoney leading Mr. Negron by 48 percent to 41 percent, with 11 percent undecided. But this week two nonpartisan Congressional handicappers, Stuart Rothenberg and Charlie Cook, changed their assessments of the race from "leans Democrat" to "tossup."
What? You mean, that's it? Two people decide the race is a tossup, citing no new polls or any other development and the NYT is practically giving this race to Negron? Just to clarify, the "poll conducted in mid-October for The South Florida Sun-Sentinel" was done by Research 2000. How about the
other poll conducted last month, which was done by RT Strategies/Constituent Dynamics (Majority Watch)? Like the Research 2000 poll, it gave Mahoney a 7% advantage, which is outside the margin of error. Real Clear Politics,
CQ Politics.com, and
Election Predictions, all show this race as either
leans Democratic or
very weak Democratic gain. Why no mention of that?
This speculation seems to be based on a ruling last week by the First District Court of Appeals, which allowed the GOP to put up signs in polling places to advise that a vote for Foley is actually a vote for Negron, if they also say that a vote for the Democrat Mahoney is a vote for Mahoney. The RT Strategies/Consituent Dynamics poll indicated that if this were explained to likely voters, Mahoney's advantage narrowed from 7% to 3%. This will reduce, but not eliminate, the confusion caused by having Foley's name instead of Negron's on the balot.
Not a reflection on you, Herman, but I'm accustomed to seeing NYT writers do a better job.