WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:25 PM
Original message |
Tester leading Burns 58-37 in early voting in MT |
|
According to a poll--remember this is a democratic poll, but it's worth posting. Over 56,000 people have participated in early voting and Tester is leading among those polled 58-37. http://www.testerforsenate.com/2006/11/02/montanans-voting-for-change-voting-for-tester
|
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
DisgruntledVet
(40 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I so want to believe... |
|
...this poll because Burns has been horrible for us disabled veterans. But I don't know if I can believe polls done by the candidates.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. So why is * going there at all? |
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Uhm ... because maggots are drawn to rotting corpses? |
|
I hope Burns gets buried by Tester. I despise him for that comment to the firefighters.
|
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Why hasn't the vote counting started yet? |
|
Why are they waiting till election day to count them?
|
tcfrogs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Standard Operating Procedure |
|
at least in Illinois. Many other states as well, I suspect.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. For the same reason only those who see a lead announce early returns. |
|
The sheeple are inclined to regard a 'vote' not as a preference but as a prediction - the brain-dead inclination to be on the 'winning side.' Called the 'bandwagon effect' or lemmings-on-parade, it's one of the more disgusting behaviors of (sub)human beings.
|
cautiouslywaiting
(243 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I'd love to believe that. |
|
But I didn't think they could count the votes for early voting yet. I'm pretty sure they don't.
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. I think they're polling people, asking them if they've voted yet and |
|
for whom, and then extrapolating the results...
It's not an official announcement of actual early votes, but a polling firm's attempt to estimate actual early votes
|
cautiouslywaiting
(243 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
sarcasmo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
9. It's time to kick A$$ and take names. |
TlalocW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
11. So... 56,000 people in Montana have voted. About 2000 people left? |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. There are only about 600,000 registered voters in MT |
|
Almost 10% already voting?
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-02-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I knew Tester would pull this off. He seems so bright and intelligent compared to Conrad.....Uh, wasn't the idiot in Montana today or yesterday? One of the so-called big gun repukes was there. Looks like it worked wonders.:rofl:
Go TESTER!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |